Padmavathi vs The State And Others
Judges: A Selvam, M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI H.C.P.No.756 of 2017 Padmavathi Petitioner vs.1. The State, rep.by the Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2. The District Col...
Madras High Court
V Dominic Mark vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Police And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·When the matter was listed on 22.08.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the matter was ordered to be posted after one week. Thereafter, when the matter was called on 13.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be posted on...
Madras High Court
N Manjula vs The Deputy Director Of General And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·When the matter was listed on 04.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the matter was ordered to be adjourned to 08.09.2017. Thereafter, when the matter was called on 08.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be posted o...
Madras High Court
V Rajamanickam vs The Commissioner Of Police And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·M.DHANDAPANI, J.tsi Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withd...
Madras High Court
M/S Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs The Doveton – Corrle Protestant Schools Association * Now Known As Doveton Protestant Schools Association Rep By Its President Nos 1 12A And Others
Judges: Abdul Quddhose, Rajiv Shakder
14 September, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDER, J)1. Issue notice. Mr.Siddharth Bahety, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1/plaintiff.2. Counsel for respondent No.1/plaintiff (hereafter referred to as "Association") says that he does not wish to file a counter affidavit and will argue the ...
Madras High Court
Shobana vs The Secretary To The Government And Others
Judges: A Selvam, M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 14.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI H.C.P.No.488 of 2017 Shobana .. Petitioner Vs1. The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat,...
Madras High Court
G Amala vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Secretary And Others
Judges: A Selvam, M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 14.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI H.C.P.No.1240 of 2017 G.Amala .. Petitioner Vs1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Depa...
Madras High Court
C Duraisamy vs The Superintending Engineer And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·Challenging the Charge Memo dated 19.06.2004 and the subsequent Final Show Cause Notice dated 24.09.2004 of the 1st respondent, the present Writ Petition has been filed.2. The case of the petitioner is that he was working as a Revenue Supervisor at Veerahanur Operation & Maintenance Section. While s...
Madras High Court
Selvarani Spinning Mills ( P)Ltd ( Formerly Gtv Spinners Ltd ) Rep By It'S Manager L Sethuraman vs Government Of India Rep By Director General Of Foreign Trade And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·When the matter was listed on 28.08.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the matter was ordered to be posted after one week. Thereafter, when the matter was called on 08.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be posted on...
Madras High Court
V Murugesan vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
14 September, 2017·When the matter was listed on 13.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be posted on 14.09.2017 under the caption, ''for dismissal''. Thereafter, when the matter is called today i.e. on 14.09.2017, there is no representation for the peti...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.