Sheela vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: A Selvam, P Kalaiyarasan
18 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 18.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN H.C.P.No.800 of 2017 Sheela .. Petitioner Vs1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Exci...
Madras High Court
The Special ÒFficer/ President Chintadripet Urban Cooperative Credit Society Limited ` vs The Chief Judge/ Presiding Officer The Special Tribunal For Cooperative Cases/ Court Of Small Causes Chennai And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
18 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.09.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.14354 of 2015and M.P.No.1 of 2015The Special Òfficer/ President Chintadripet Urban Cooperative Credit Society Limited ` .. Petitioner vs.1. The Chief Judge/ Presiding Off...
Madras High Court
Raj @ Piliki Raj vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By Its Secretary To Government Home And Others
Judges: A Selvam, P Kalaiyarasan
18 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 18.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN H.C.P.No.1445 of 2017 Raj @ Piliki Raj .. Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary to Government Home, Prohi...
Madras High Court
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice ... vs The Deputy Inspector General Of ...
Judges:
18 September, 2017·The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 21.07.2015.2. The writ petitioner was working as Inspector of Police and placed under suspension in proceedings of the year 2010. The learned counsel a...
Madras High Court
M/S. Brigade Enterprises Limited vs M/S. Crysttal Creations (India)
Judges:
18 September, 2017·The learned counsel for the plaintiff has made the following endorsement:-Suit may be permitted to be withdrawn as the issue in the suit have been settled for the plaintiff seek refund of entire Court fee.2. In view of the same, the suit is dismissed as settled out of the Court. Office is directed...
Madras High Court
S.Parthiban vs K.Thangamuthu
Judges:
18 September, 2017·No representation for the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner is present and made an endorsement indicating that he is not pressing the Civil Revision Petition.2.In the light of the above position, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, the c...
Madras High Court
Management vs Sarguru And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
18 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.34588 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.Nos. 42015/2003 & 10875 of 2004 Management, Meera Textiles and Industries India Ltd., Rep. by its Excise Officer, Mr.Deenadayalan, having office at Formally No.6...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.19490 Of 2017 vs State Represented By
Judges:
18 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 12.08.2015 and investigate the same according to law.2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.3.The grievance of...
Madras High Court
The Honourable Mr. Justice ... vs The State Rep. By
Judges:
18 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent police to register a case based on the statement recorded by the respondent police in Government Hospital at Perambalur in CSR.No.98 of 2017 dated 19.08.2017 and investigate the same in accordance with law.2.By consent of both sides, this ...
Madras High Court
M/S.Aswins Home Special vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)
Judges:
18 September, 2017·sli8. Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are quashed. The matters are remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration only with regard to the determination of the alleged escaped taxable turnover. The penalty, which was levied under Section 27(3)(c) of the said Ac...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.