K Balakumaran vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
22 September, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents herein from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business (i.e.) cross massage in the name and style of “Kayal Day Spa” at 1/888, Mache Gounder Palayam, L & T Bye-pass Road, Poonthottam, Eache...
Madras High Court
K A Sankaran vs M Raj And Others
Judges: M Govindaraj
22 September, 2017·Aggrieved over the long pendency of the Execution Petition in R.E.P.No.313 of 1997 in O.S.No.261 of 1977, on the file of the Sub Court, Krishnagiri, the petitioner has come before this Court with this Civil Revision Petition.2. Admittedly, the decree was passed on 24.10.1997. The litigation went upt...
Madras High Court
V Srivatsan vs S R Gayathri
Judges: M Govindaraj
22 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 22.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ CRP[PD].No.3003 of 2017 and CMP.Nos.14123 and 16207 of 2017 V.Srivatsan .. Petitioner Vs S.R.Gayathri .. Respondents Civil Revision Petitio...
Madras High Court
A M Ponnuranga Mudliar ( Deceased ) Rep By His L R A P Gopikrishna ( And Others vs The State Transport Appellate Tribunal And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
22 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.Nos.26742 and 26743 of 2004 A.M.Ponnuranga Mudliar (deceased) Rep. by his L.R.A.P.Gopikrishna (L.R. impleaded as L.R. Of the deceased petitioner as per Court order dated 07.07.2008 in W.P.M....
Madras High Court
M/S Kozone Reality Private Ltd vs Mrs Susila And Others
Judges: Anita Sumanth
22 September, 2017·This petition is filed by Kozone Reality Private Limited praying for constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal at Coimbatore comprising three Arbitrators to decide all disputes arising from and under Joint Development Agreement dated 10.7.2011.2. The petitioner and the respondents entered into a ...
Madras High Court
K R Babu vs The Special District Revenue Officer ( L A ) National Highways Scheme 205 Tiruvallur Periyakuppam Tiruvallur District And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
22 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.Nos.25479 to 25486 of 2017 W.P.No.25479/2017 K.R.Babu ...Petitioner v.1. The Special District Revenue Officer (L.A.) National Highways Scheme - 205 - Tiruvallur Periy...
Madras High Court
S Natarajan vs The Assistant Director
Judges: M Dhandapani
22 September, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Conse...
Madras High Court
Peter Rajamanickam And Others vs State : Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: G Jayachandran
22 September, 2017·The appellants herein were tried for the offence under Section 120B r/w 7 and 120B r/w 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and found them guilty of the said offences. The trial Court has convicted the first appellant for the offence under Section 120B IPC r/w 7 of Prevention of...
Madras High Court
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd vs A Pugazhendi Varma
Judges: M Govindaraj
22 September, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the dismissal of the review petition filed by the petitioner.2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit. They have filed a suit for recovery of money to the tune of Rs.1,93,450/- with subsequent interest. The petitioner / plaintiff has st...
Madras High Court
Viacom 18 Media Private Limited Suit 410 vs 1 Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited Bharath Sanchar Bhavan Harish Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited 5 Th Floor Mahanagar Doorsanchar Sadan 9
Judges: Anita Sumanth
22 September, 2017·Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff seeks permission to withdraw the suit and makes an endorsement to this effect. Accordingly, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected applications are closed. No Costs.22.09.2017 msv Dr.Anita Sumanth,J msv C.S.No.129 of 2017 Original Appl...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.