S.Kathiresan vs Mr.M.Gajendran
Judges:
06 November, 2017·Heard Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.K.Baskara Panidan, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondent.2.It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 22.04.2015 in W.P.(MD)No.6291 of 2015, had been compl...
Madras High Court
Venkidu @ Venkittan vs The Principal Secretary To The ...
Judges:
06 November, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J] The petitioner is the detenu viz., Venkidu @ Venkittan S/o.Thangavel, aged about 39 years. The detenu has been detained, as per the order of the second respondent, dated 23.05.2017, under Section 2(e) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, branding him as ?Dr...
Madras High Court
K.Jawaharlal vs R.Rengarajan
Judges:
06 November, 2017·This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their willful, deliberate, disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.1112 of 2016 dated 28.01.2016.2.Heard, Mr.D.Senthil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.D.Sivaraman, learned counsel appearing for t...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs State Rep. By
Judges:
06 November, 2017·The prayer sought for in the present petition is to direct the respondent police to issue the 'Not traceable Certificate' for the last Settlement Deed dated 06.06.2011 and registered as Doct. No.2568 of 2011 in SRO, Vellakovil pursuant to the petitioner's complaint dated 03.04.2017 within a stipulat...
Madras High Court
P.Anil Kumar vs Ms.P.Vasundhara Devi @ Kanchana
Judges:
06 November, 2017·These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed to call for the records in the Criminal complaint in C.C.No.1496 and 1489 of 2017 filed by the respondent and pending on the file of the learned Fast Track Court-III, Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai-15 and quash the same under Sectio...
Madras High Court
Kompammal @ Thayammal vs Poolpandian
Judges:
06 November, 2017·The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants. The plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.100 of 2001 before the District Munsif, Kovilpatti, for partition. The suit was decreed vide order dated 01.04.2011. Aggrieved against the said order, the defendants 1 to 3 filed an appeal be...
Madras High Court
P.Jeyapaul Rajasingh vs The Tamilnadu Dr.Ambedkar Law ...
Judges:
06 November, 2017·The petitioner seeks permission to attend the counseling to be held on 08.11.2017 by the respondent for admission to three years B.L., Degree Course in any one of the Government Law Colleges in Tamil Nadu.2.The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner will be...
Madras High Court
The General Manger vs Ganesan
Judges:
06 November, 2017·Heard the learned counsel on either side.2.The Transport Corporation has filed this appeal questioning the award mainly on the ground of liability. It is the case of head on collision involving the bus belonging to the appellant Transport Corporation and the lorry driven by the claimant. It is seen ...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.23697 Of 2017 vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
06 November, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent police to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 06.10.2017.2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.