H.C.P.No.135 Of 2017 vs The State Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
03 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Habeas corpus petition is filed challenging the order of detention passed by the second respondent against the detenue Thiru.Aamaikutti @ Ravi S/o.Kathan in C.O.C.No.89/2016 dated 29.12.2016.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the...
Madras High Court
Madura College Higher Secondary ... vs The District Education Officer
Judges:
03 March, 2017·The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant approval to the appointment made by the petitioner to Madura College Higher Secondary School for the post of Library Record Clerk, by considering the proposal of the petitioner school dated 11.1...
Madras High Court
H.C.P.No.2141 Of 2016 vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
03 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Habeas corpus petition is filed challenging the order of detention passed by the second respondent against the detenue Reena W/o.Saravanan in C3.D.O.No.55/2016 dated 30.08.2016.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the impugned orde...
Madras High Court
K.Sugantha D.Christobel vs )The Commissioner Of Civil ...
Judges:
03 March, 2017·The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the files of the 1st respondent pertaining to the order bearing Che.Mu.Order.No.A1/3949/2017 dated 28.02.2017 and to quash the same with regard to the Serial No.9 as illegal.2.The petitioner has chal...
Madras High Court
G.Devendiran vs The General Manager
Judges:
03 March, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.P.Kannan Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.2 The petitioner joined the services of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation as a Driver on 23.08.1981 [Staff No.J0 2922] and at the time of retirement on...
Madras High Court
The Correspondent vs T.Sabeetha
Judges:
03 March, 2017·It is represented by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.3414 of 2015, dated 15.3.2016 has been complied with and has also produced a communication of the fourth respondent to that effect. A copy of the same has also been han...
Madras High Court
K.Mayilvahanan vs Sabitha
Judges:
03 March, 2017·The respondent has complied with the order passed by this Court. In view of the same, the contempt petition is closed. Consequently, Sub Application No.68 of 2017 is closed.03.03.2017 tar K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.(tar) Cont. P. No.354 of 2015 03.03.2017...
Madras High Court
Muthurakku : Revision vs Athi. Panchanathan
Judges:
03 March, 2017·This Civil Revision petition has been field against the fair and decreetal order dated 18.04.2015 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai in I.A.No.62 of 2013 in unnumbered A.S.No... 2013 filed challenging the judgement and decree in O.S.No.204 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, S...
Madras High Court
K.Chandran vs The Management
Judges:
03 March, 2017·Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned award dated 21.07.2003 passed by the 3rd respondent Labour Court in I.D.No.23 of 1996 in so far as it relates to the denial o...
Madras High Court
H.C.P.No.2328 Of 2016 vs The Principal Secretary
Judges:
03 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Habeas corpus petition is filed challenging the order of detention passed by the second respondent against the detenue Immanuel S/o.Stalin in No.C3/D.O.No.66/2016 dated 11.10.2016.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the impugned o...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.