T.P.Paramjothi vs P.R.Karupaiah
Judges:
03 March, 2017·The defendant in O.S.No.1399 of 2005 on the file of VII Additional District Judge,City Civil Court, Chennai is the appellant. The respondent/plaintiff had filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.5,25,500/- with interest at 24% per annum.2. According to the plaintiff, the defendant had borrowed a ...
Madras High Court
H.C.P.No.2410 Of 2016 vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
03 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Habeas corpus petition is filed challenging the order of detention passed by the second respondent against the detenue Suman S/o.Rose in BCDFGISSSV No.25/2016 dated 29.09.2016.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the impugned order...
Madras High Court
S.Ponnusamy vs S.Nirmala
Judges:
03 March, 2017·The respondents have complied with the order passed by this Court. In view of the same, the contempt petition is closed. Consequently, Sub Application Nos.69 and 70 of 2017 are closed.03.03.2017 tar Cont. P. No.1454 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs State By
Judges:
03 March, 2017·Petitioner challenges the order of learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tindivanam, passed in C.M.P.No.3718 of 2016 on 05.01.2017.2. Respondent has seized a Hero Splendor Pro bearing Registration No.TN-19-U-5233, belonging to petitioner in connection with the case registered in Crime No.199 of 2016 on...
Madras High Court
Milton Ponraj vs The Secretary To Government
Judges:
03 March, 2017·This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the third respondent passed in Na.Ka.No.4568/A4/2015, dated 27.2.2017 vide which, the third respondent has returned the proposal, based on the decision taken at the meeting held on 8.5.2001 and by relying on a consequential Government ...
Madras High Court
S.Karthikeyani vs Mr.M.G.Jayakumar
Judges:
03 March, 2017·both Cont.Ps.PETITIONS under <act id=crGwPokB_szha0nW889g section=11>Section 11 </act>of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for his act of willful disobedience of the common order of this Court made in W.P.Nos.24055 & 24056 of 2016 dated 13.7.2016.For Petitioners : Mr.G.Punnia...
Madras High Court
Abdul Hamid Khadir vs Kalander Naina Mohammed
Judges:
03 March, 2017·When the matter is taken up today, there is no representation for the plaintiff. This suit has been listed before the Master for recording evidence. Even before the Master, the plaintiff has not appeared for several hearings, for leading evidence on his side. Hence, this suit is dismissed for non-pr...
Madras High Court
V.Rajalingam vs The Managing Director
Judges:
03 March, 2017·The petitioner was the employee of the respondent Corporation and he retired from service on 31.03.2013 on attaining the age of superannuation.2.He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits.3.The First Bench of this Court in similar matter...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Mrs.S.Sornapuspam
Judges:
03 March, 2017·Challenging the finding on negligence as well as quantum of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.126 of 2012, dated 23.12.2014, the Transport Corporation has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The deceased, Rajamathi, aged 45 years, a self employed earning a sum of Rs....
Madras High Court
S.Reghu Lal vs J.Tomba Singh .. 1St
Judges:
03 March, 2017·5. The learned counsel appearing for the Insurance company submitted that the Doctor, who assessed the disability suffered by the claimant as 94%, has categorically stated in his evidence that he has assessed only the percentage of disability suffered by the claimant and not the earning capacity. Bu...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.