M.Vairavan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
28 March, 2017·The prayer in the Writ Petition, is for issuance of a Writ of Declaration, to declare the entire acquisition proceedings as null and void, and lapsed in view of the notice, dated 07.03.2003, issued by the 2nd respondent, proposing to pass an award, in respect of the lands in Ramanathapuram Taluk-Sak...
Madras High Court
P.Satheesh vs Arul Prakash
Judges:
28 March, 2017·Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. C.T.SELVAM, J gm Recording the said endorsement, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.28.03.2017 ...
Madras High Court
T.Sri Skantharaja : Revision vs Kala
Judges:
28 March, 2017·This Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.55 of 2017 in MC No.136 of 2015, dated 28.03.2017 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli.2.The respondent herein is the wife of one Dharmaraj. The petitioner helped the respondent for the purpose of celebration of her...
Madras High Court
Syndicate Bank Schedule Tribe vs Syndicate Bank
Judges:
28 March, 2017·The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, seeking to quash the the circular, dated 23.12.2003, issued by the respondent-Bank, whereby, the Loan Sanctioning Authorities have been instructed not to grant loan and any other benefits to the employees of the Bank, who are facing departmental proceedin...
Madras High Court
K.S.D.J. Ponsingh vs Rajasekar @ Christantain ...
Judges:
28 March, 2017·Prayer: Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the orders passed in C.C.No.420 of 2014 by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchendur, dated 05.04.2016 and set aside the same by allowing the Revision Petition.This Criminal Revision Case ...
Madras High Court
Duraisamy vs P.Velayutham (Died)
Judges:
28 March, 2017·The civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 12 April 2013 dismissing the application in I.A.No.67 of 2013 in O.S.No.339 of 2005 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1141 days in filing the petition under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC.2. Heard the learned ...
Madras High Court
Tvl.Naman Road Carrier vs The Commercial Tax Officer
Judges:
28 March, 2017·Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax), takes notice for the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2. Heard both sides.3. The petitioner is aggrieved against the goods detention notice f...
Madras High Court
S.Radhamani vs The Member Secretary
Judges:
28 March, 2017·all W.Ps.COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions are filed under <act id=zbGxPokB_szha0nWKNIH section=226>Article 226 </act>of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.98/14-Thoo.Vu.Thi.Ku d...
Madras High Court
G.Yesurajan vs Smt. Sabitha
Judges:
28 March, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents / contemnors submitted that the order of this Court in the Writ Petition has been complied with in letter and spirit. A copy of the proceedings dated 28.03.2017 passed by the thi...
Madras High Court
C.Loganayaki vs P.G.Diwakar
Judges:
28 March, 2017·None appears on behalf of the petitioners. The learned counsel for the respondent is present. The Civil revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.28.03.2017 K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.Gms/dsa To1. The VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai,2. X Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.C.R.P.(N.P....
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.