Miss.Lakshmi vs The Sub Registrar
Judges:
13 March, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2 The petitioner who is the owner of the property admeasuring an extent of 3 acres in Patta No.800 in Survey No.74/1 at Sikrapalayam Villag...
Madras High Court
Premila vs P.Karthikeyan
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The petitioner has filed this petition to call for the records in C.C.No.309 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pudhucherry and quash the same.2. The respondent had filed a complaint against the petitioner and two others for the offences under <act id=ObGxPokB_szha0nWLtNN ...
Madras High Court
Khandelwal Laboratories Pvt. Ltd vs Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The learned counsel for the sought permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant and the endorsement made, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellan...
Madras High Court
S.Kariammal vs Natrayan
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The above Second Appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree, dated 24.02.1995 made in A.S.No.65 of 1994 on the file of the District Court, Dindigul, confirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 30.06.1993 made in O.S.No.19 of 1991 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Dindigul.2.Parties will be ref...
Madras High Court
G.Balan vs 4 The State Level
Judges:
13 March, 2017·(made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.) The notice sent by the State Level Scrutiny Committee calling upon the petitioner to appear for enquiry to decide his community status is challenged in this Writ Petition on the ground that pendency of the proceedings cannot be a reason to withhold his terminal benefits....
Madras High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Sathyam Infoway Ltd.
Judges:
13 March, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.)1. This is an appeal filed under <act id=4bGxPokB_szha0nWD9DQ section=260>Section 260 </act>A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act), against the judgement and order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, dated 22.08.2007.2.This appea...
Madras High Court
Sayyed Rizwan Ali vs The State By
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.To1.The Judicia...
Madras High Court
Shanmugam vs Senthilkumar
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The facts which give rise to file this revision are stated hereunder:A complaint was lodged by the defacto complainant, the first respondent herein, against the petitioners/accused before the second respondent on 14.11.2013. On the basis of the complaint, a case was registered by the second responde...
Madras High Court
Tr.C.M.P.No.393 Of 2013 vs A.John Morris (A) Morris
Judges:
13 March, 2017·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.2. The petitioner, who is the wife of the 1st respondent, has filed the above Civil Revision Petition to withdraw the Original Petition in G.W.O.P.No.40 of 2013, pending on the file of the District Court, Chengal...
Madras High Court
A. Kareem Bacha vs Mariyambeevi(Died)
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the submission and the endorsement, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous p...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.