1 S Vijayalakshmi 2 Beulah Roy 3 R Bhaskaran 4 Anuradha Ramesh 5 Sharadha Sundaraman 6 S S Vijayalakshmi 7 Lakshmi R R Narayan vs The Union Of India Rep By The Deputy Director Pay General Manager Southern
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
13 March, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :: 13.03.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P. Nos.23257, 23258 of 2015 W.P.No.23257 of 20151 S.Vijayalakshmi2 Beulah Roy3 R.Bhaskaran4 Anuradha Ramesh5 Sharadha Sundaraman6 S.S.Vijayalak...
Madras High Court
Union Of India And Others vs The Registrar The Central Administrative Tribunals And Others
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
13 March, 2017·K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.None appears on behalf of the petitioners. The endorsement made by the Registry indicates that effective steps were not taken by the petitioners to serve notice on the respondents.2. The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.Consequently, connected miscellaneous p...
Madras High Court
Animal Husbandry Dairying And Fisheries Krishi Bhavan New Delhi 2 The Director Central Cattle Breading Farm & Post Alamathi Chennai 52 3 S Sekar 4 C vs The Registrar Central Admn Tribunal Madras Bench High Court Buildings Chennai 104 (
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
13 March, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on :: 0913.03.2017 Delivered on :: 13.03.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARANW.P. No.27980 of 2015T.Munirathnam ... petitioner Vs1 Union of India rep. by the Secretary t...
Madras High Court
G Balan vs The General State Level Scrutinizing Committee Rep By Secretary Cum Chairman Adi Dravida And Tribal Welfare Department Chennai 9 ,The State Level Scrutinizing Committee Rep By Secretary Cum Chairman Adi Dravida And Tribal Welfare Department Chennai 9
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
13 March, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :: 13.03.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARANW.P. No.34581 OF 2014G.Balan ... petitioner versus1 The General Manager Suyndicate Bank HR Department Head Office Manipa...
Madras High Court
Mrs.V.Rajitha vs M/S.The Waterbase Limited
Judges:
13 March, 2017·both Crl.O.Ps' Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and quash the proceedings in respect of the petitioners above said in C.C.Nos.2022 and 2023/2011 pending before the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai.For Petitioners : Mr.R.Cha...
Madras High Court
Smt.P.Poongodi vs The District Collector
Judges:
13 March, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.R.S.Selvam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2 The petitioners were in possession of the lands admeasuring to an extent of 8.41 acres, 11.48 acres, 6.82 acres and 14.46 acres respectively in S.Nos...
Madras High Court
M.A.Venkat vs The Chairman
Judges:
13 March, 2017·Mr.S.K.Rameshwar, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents.2.The petitioner is challenging the impugned order, which is only an audit report requiring action to be taken for recovery of amount, pursuant to the earlier meter having become defective. Therefore, this Court is of the view that t...
Madras High Court
K.R.Kannan vs )R.Krishnammal
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit filed for partition. The plaintiff is the son of Late N.K.Radhakrishnan. The 1st defendant is the wife of Late N.K.Radhakrishnan and defendants 2 and 3 are daughters of Late N.K.Radhakrishnan.2.The defendants 1 and 3 filed written statement contes...
Madras High Court
K.Y.Sundaram vs P.Sivakumar
Judges:
13 March, 2017·This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code.2. This Petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the criminal complaint being C.C.No.124 of 2010 on the file of Judicial Magistrate-IV at Thirupathur , Vellore District.3. The complaint is inter alia un...
Madras High Court
M.Jeyamani vs The Cgm And Secretary
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.01.2017.2.According to the petitioner, she had submitted a representation dated 30.01.2017 addressed to the first respondent requesting him to take action for return of jewels, which...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.