P.Indirani vs 3 Mrs.Chitra
Judges:
15 March, 2017·By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.K.Bhuvaneswari, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2 .2 The 1st petitioner would aver that her father, viz., Perumal S/o.Arjunan, had executed a registered Will bearing Doc.No.894/1963 dated 03...
Madras High Court
J.Sebastial Rani vs The Management
Judges:
15 March, 2017·The prayer in the writ petition runs as follows:This petition is a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the impugned order of the 2nd respondent, dated 14.09.2012 made in Na.Ka.No.3114- A3/2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to give approval for the petitioner'...
Madras High Court
A.B.Gulbeer vs The Principal Secretary
Judges:
15 March, 2017·Ms.R.Vaishnavi, learned counsel attached to the office of Mr.C.Prakasam, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue the remedy u/s.83 of the Wakf Act, 1995 and has also made an endorseme...
Madras High Court
)K.Irulappan vs )Ammavasai
Judges:
15 March, 2017·Both the Civil Revision Petitions arising out of the orders passed by the Execution Court, pursuant to the direction passed by this Court in the earlier revision petitions CRP(PD)(MD)No.862/2009 and CRP(NPD)(MD)No.1840/2014. In the earlier round of litigation, this Court has passed a common order da...
Madras High Court
V. Alphonse vs 5 The District Treasury Officer
Judges:
15 March, 2017·Mr. T.M. Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondents. With consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2 This writ petition has been preferred seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to re-fix the consolida...
Madras High Court
K.Sundharamoorthy vs The Commissioner Of Police
Judges:
15 March, 2017·This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner on the guise of inquiry.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record.3. Mr.M.Sivasamy, Sp...
Madras High Court
M.Pradeep Ramkumar vs M.Seenivasan
Judges:
15 March, 2017·This petition has been filed seeking quash of Private Complaint in S.T.C.No.252 of 2016, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai.2.It is the case of the Complainant that he is doing Vegetable Wholesale Business and that the petitioner/accused approached the complainant for urge...
Madras High Court
Pravin A.K vs Karuppusamy
Judges:
15 March, 2017·Learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.Recording the said endorsement, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.15.03.2017 Index:yes/no Inte...
Madras High Court
R.Vinod Kumar Bokaria vs 3 The Executive Engineer
Judges:
15 March, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Acting Chief Justice) Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.R.Arunmozhi, learned counsel takes notice for respondents 2 and 3.2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of...
Madras High Court
A.Palpandi vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By
Judges:
15 March, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the first respondent to dispose of appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 44 of the Madurai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1971, on 09.02.2017 as ea...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.