P.Selvaraj vs The Management Of State Express
Judges:
17 March, 2017·The petitioner was employed as Conductor in the respondents Corporation and he retired from service on 30.09.14, on reaching the age of superannuation.2.He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits.3.The First Bench of this Court in simila...
Madras High Court
S.Devadoss vs The Management Of Tamilnadu State
Judges:
17 March, 2017·The petitioner was employed as Conductor in the respondents Corporation and he retired from service on 31.12.2013, on reaching the age of superannuation.2.He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits.3.The First Bench of this Court in simi...
Madras High Court
N.R.Gayathiri vs Mrs.Amudha Valli
Judges:
17 March, 2017·No representation for the petitioner. When the matter is taken up, learned Government Advocate, by producing a copy of the proceeding dated 15.03.2017 of the respondent addressed to him and also a copy of the proceedings dated 14.03.2017 addressed to the Principal Accountant General, Chennai, submit...
Madras High Court
W.P. No.6509 Of 2017 vs The General Manager
Judges:
17 March, 2017·Mr. P. Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. With consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2 This writ petition has been preferred seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to disburse the surrender leave ...
Madras High Court
S.Ramkumar vs The Principal Secretary To ...
Judges:
17 March, 2017·The petitioner was appointed as Junior Assistant in the Rural Development Department and was promoted as Block Development Officer, on 07.06.2008. In 2009, according to the petitioner, he was implicated falsely in a criminal case by the Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing and he was suspended from se...
Madras High Court
W.P. No.6513 Of 2017 vs The General Manager
Judges:
17 March, 2017·Mr. P. Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. With consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2 This writ petition has been preferred seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to disburse the surrender leave ...
Madras High Court
W.P. No.6575 Of 2017 vs 3 The Administrator
Judges:
17 March, 2017·Mr. R.K. Gandhi, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondents. With consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2 This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following relief:a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse ...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The Director
Judges:
17 March, 2017·The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider her complaint dated 13.02.2017 according to law and take appropriate action against the third respondent through the second respondent.2. It is the case of the petitioner that she alo...
Madras High Court
Jegatha vs District Revenue Officer
Judges:
17 March, 2017·By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner claims that she belongs to Scheduled Caste community and is in possession of Adidravida Panjami land, through file No.8A/75/78, dated 23.04.1969 and her grievance is while updating the register, without putting her on no...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.