Rajendran vs Dr. Elangovan Vadegiri
Judges:
28 June, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 07.07.2015 made in I.A.No.351 of 2015 in I.A.No.223 of 2013 in O.S.No.78 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Attur.2. The petitioners are the defendants 1 to 7, respondents 1 and 2 are the plaintif...
Madras High Court
The Manager vs K.Subbaiah
Judges:
28 June, 2017·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed to set aside the decree and judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal – IV Additional District Judge, Madurai, dated 28.06.2017, in M.C.O.P.No.2283 of 2014 and to allow the Appeal.2.The appellant herein is the fourth respondent, the respondents 1 to 4 h...
Madras High Court
Karthikeyan vs Rajeshkannan
Judges:
28 June, 2017·For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by their name.2. Rajeshkannan engaged the services of Karthikeyan, a building contractor, for renovation of his house and entered into an agreement. There was delay in completing the renovation work though Rajeshkannan had paid some amount...
Madras High Court
S.Shanmugasundara Bhattar vs )The Joint Commissioner
Judges:
28 June, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving lib...
Madras High Court
Shanmuganathan vs Beeman
Judges:
28 June, 2017·This Revision Petition is directed against the concurrent finding of the Rent Control Tribunal as well as the Rent Control Appellate Authority in the petition filed by the landlord for eviction on the ground of own occupation and wilful default.2.The case of the revision petitioner/tenant is that wh...
Madras High Court
P.V.S.Shanmugam vs P.Dhasarathan
Judges:
28 June, 2017·The unsuccessful plaintiff before the first appellate Court, is the appellant herein.2. The plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of money from the defendants in a sum of Rs.5,200/- which the plaintiff has to shell out in E.P.No.171 of 1987, vide order dated 28.11.1991. According to the plaintif...
Madras High Court
Kathiresan vs State Rep By
Judges: R Mahadevan
28 June, 2017·This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to investigate the case registered in Crime No.311 of 2016, pending on his file and file final report within a stipulated time frame.2. When this Criminal Original Petition wad taken up, the learned Additional Public Pros...
Madras High Court
K.S.N.P.Thangathurai Nadar ... vs Indian Overseas Bank
Judges:
28 June, 2017·This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment and decree, dated 30.09.1993 in O.S.No.426 of 1992 passed by the Additional Subordinate Court, Dindigul.2. The defendants in the suit are the appellants herein. The Suit was filed by the respondent, the Indian Overseas Bank, Pattiveernapatti Branch...
Madras High Court
G.Kalaivendhan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
28 June, 2017·[Judgment of the Court by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.2. This review petition is to review the Judgment, dated 25.04.2017, made in W.A.(MD) No.13...
Madras High Court
A Kumaresan And Others vs The Tahsildar
Judges: M Duraiswamy
28 June, 2017·The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to conduct an enquiry and issue patta in their names in respect of the property comprised in S.No.506/16 (Old S.No.30/6 and 7), situated at P.Vaduga Palayam Village, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur Dis...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.