K.Sri Kumar vs The Commissioner
Judges:
29 June, 2017·The facts in nutshell required to be considered in this Writ Petition is that the writ petitioner was appointed as an Electrician Grade-I in Tirunelveli Municipality on 22th February, 1991, and thereafter the Municipality was designated as City Municipal Corporation and the writ petitioner continued...
Madras High Court
Ganesan vs The Chief Executive
Judges:
29 June, 2017·When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as wi...
Madras High Court
P.Suruli vs Syndicate Bank
Judges:
29 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.C.M.Arumugam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.R.Pandivel, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents / Bank.2.The petitioner is a borrower of a loan from the 2nd respondent / Syndicate Bank and challenging the ...
Madras High Court
Eswaran Pillai vs The District Collector
Judges:
29 June, 2017·P r a y e r : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the Petitioner's representat5ion dated 29.6.2017 to measure the Petitioner's land in S.No. 37/8A, measuring an extent of 8.50 a...
Madras High Court
Union Of India; vs A.Annamary Ramya
Judges:
29 June, 2017·K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.The claim made by the first respondent for compassionate appointment was negatived by the first petitioner. However, the first petitioner made it clear that the case of the first respondent will be considered by the Circle Relaxation Committee for the vacancies of subsequent years,...
Madras High Court
M.Rajesh vs The Chairman And Managing ...
Judges:
29 June, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent development nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect.2. recording the endorsement made by the ...
Madras High Court
Vinod Jeba Asir vs State Rep. By
Judges:
29 June, 2017·M/s.M.Malathi, Woman Head Constable, All Women Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District, is present in Court today. On instructions, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the trial in C.C.No.78 of 2011 has commenced and two witnesses have been examined. Recording the ...
Madras High Court
A Kalappan vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
29 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.16362 of 2017 A.Kalappan .. Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Kottakuppam Police Station, Kottakuppam, Villupuram District. .. Respond...
Madras High Court
Sree Ayyanar Spinning And Wearing ... vs Government Of India
Judges:
29 June, 2017·Impugned Notification dated 18.11.2002 was issued by the competent authority under the provisions of the ESI Act. Section 1(3) therein empowers the authority to issue order in implementation of the scheme. The only grievance set out in the Writ Petition as submitted by the learned counsel for the pe...
Madras High Court
G Babu vs The Secretary To Government Home ( Police Ii ) Department Fort St George And Others
Judges: M Govindaraj
29 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.06.2017C O R A MTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ W.P.NO.9138 OF 2013G.Babu ... PetitionerVs.1. The Secretary to Government Home (Police II) Department Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.2. The Director General of P...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.