R. Vidhya vs Tmt. Uma
Judges:
29 June, 2017·This contempt petition has been filed alleging that the respondent has not complied with the order dated 21.03.2017 passed by this Court in W.P. No.6855 of 2017. T. RAJA, J.cad 2 Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, it was jointly submitted by the learned counsel on either side that the ...
Madras High Court
Sumithra vs Vimalraj
Judges:
29 June, 2017·This petition is filed to withdraw and transfer the case in H.M.O.P.No. 289 of 2016 from the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge at Poonamallee, to the file of Sub Court, Chidambaram.2. The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. In the wedlock, two female children were born. Due to ...
Madras High Court
The Executive Officer vs T.Mariappan
Judges:
29 June, 2017·[Judgment of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.R.Chandrasekaran, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr.V.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 and 3.2. This writ appeal is directed against the order, dated 22.03.2017 made in W...
Madras High Court
Subbiah (Died) vs Thiruneelapandian
Judges:
29 June, 2017·This appeal has been filed by the defendants 1 to 3 in OS.No.280 of 1998, against the judgment and decree, dated 05.06.2003 passed by the Sub Judge, Kovilpatti.2. The suit in O.S.No.280 of 1998 had been filed by the first respondent in this appeal, seeking specific performance of the agreement of sa...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The District Collector
Judges:
29 June, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2 The grievance expressed by the writ petitioner is that despite the Lok Adalat Award dated 06.07.2011 made in WP.No.3677/2007, the official respondents did not implement the same and therefore, the petitioner is constrained to approach th...
Madras High Court
Mullaiyambal vs Narayanasamy Udayar
Judges:
29 June, 2017·When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner died. Recording the submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected Misc...
Madras High Court
Tamil Selvan vs Dr Arasakumar And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
29 June, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN A.S.No.248 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.9750 of 2017 Tamil Selvan .. Appellant Vs.1. Dr.Arasakumar2. Mrs.Sarlet Mariya Selva Rani .. Respondents Prayer: Appeal suit filed under Under order XLI Rule 1 and Sec.96 of CPC of the Constit...
Madras High Court
Chinnathal vs The District Collector
Judges:
29 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents not to disturb peaceful possession and enjoyment of patta land of the petitioner comprised in S.F.No.223/12c measuring 1.23.0 Hectares, by ...
Madras High Court
B.Nala Chandrasekaran vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
29 June, 2017·This petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent to register a case on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner on 22.02.2017.2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.3. In view of ...
Madras High Court
P.Prabu vs The State Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
29 June, 2017·Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent.2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authority to give permission to conduct the cultural dance program at Sri Mariamman Temple Festival on 06.07.201...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.