Vijaya Bank vs The District Collector
Judges:
12 June, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by Huluvadi G.Ramesh, J.) Mrs.A.Srijayanthi, learned Special Government Pleader, is directed to take notice on behalf of the respondents.2.This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to pass orders on the petition filed by the petitioner / Bank under Se...
Madras High Court
A.Sathyamani vs The District Collector
Judges:
12 June, 2017·This Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the correctness of the charge memo. The reason is that when the respondents have appointed the petitioner as Village Panchayat Secretary Grade II on 1.4.2008, based on the marksheet produced by him in respe...
Madras High Court
)Sellamuthu vs D.Duraisamy
Judges:
12 June, 2017·This revision petition is filed by the defendants aggrieved by the order allowing the application filed by the plaintiff to appoint Advocate Commissioner to measure the suit property and note down its physical features and count the number of trees found in the suit land.2.The case of the plaintiff ...
Madras High Court
A.Senthurpandian vs The Inspector General Of ...
Judges:
12 June, 2017·The writ petition has been listed under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of the letter dated 08.06.2017 given by the learned counsel for the petitioner before the registry and has also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect.2.Recording his submission and the endorsement, the wri...
Madras High Court
Vairappan vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
12 June, 2017·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) for the respondents.2. Today, Mr.M.Senthilkumar, Sub Inspector of Police, Chinthamanipatti Police Station, is present before this Court.3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Adv...
Madras High Court
R Mahendran vs Smt Lakshmi
Judges: M V Muralidaran
12 June, 2017·When the matter came up before this Court on 07.06.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to post "for dismissal". Accordingly, the matter was listed on 09.06.2017 under the caption "for dismissal".M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.ub2. When the matter came up ...
Madras High Court
Soloman vs Asirvatham
Judges:
12 June, 2017·When the matter came up on 07.06.2017, there was no representation for the petition. Therefore, Registry was directed to post the revision on 12.06.2017, under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petition. Therefore, this Court is constrained to dismi...
Madras High Court
P.Kesavan vs N.Vivekananda
Judges:
12 June, 2017·sji C O M M O N O R D E R When the matter camp up before this Court on 05.06.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was adjourned today i.e., 12.06.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, these petitions are d...
Madras High Court
D Sudhakar Reddy And Others vs The Inspector Of Police And Others
Judges: R Mahadevan
12 June, 2017·This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.701 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent.2. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Original Petition that the dispute between the petitioners/accused 1 and 2 and the second res...
Madras High Court
Murari Naidu [Died vs Ramalinga Naidu
Judges:
12 June, 2017·The 3rd defendant is the appellant herein. The suit in OS.No.461/1999, filed by the respondent / plaintiff herein, praying for declaration and for permanent injunction, came to be dismissed and on appeal, it was allowed and thereby, the decree has been granted. The 3rd defendant, aggrieved by the sa...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.