Metropolitan Transport ... vs Naveen
Judges:
14 June, 2017·Challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.496 of 2009, dated 03.10.2012 on the file of the MACT IV court of Small Causes, Chennai the present appeal has been filed by the Transport Corporation.2. The claimant, Naveen, a minor, aged about 12 years, met with an acci...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs S.Sivasubramaniam
Judges:
14 June, 2017·gv/dh To The Principal Subordinate Judge, Principal Subordinate Court, Tiruppur.CRP(PD)Nos.793 &794 of 2017 and CMP.Nos.3925 & 3926 of 2017 14.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
1 P Sheeba Mani [ ] 2 P Suguna 3 Violet vs The Collector Of Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur District Tahsildar Palladam Tiruppur District Village Administrative Officer Palladam Tiruppur District 5 Pon Vijayan ,The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur District Tahsildar Palladam Tiruppur District Village Administrative Officer Palladam Tiruppur District 5 Pon Vijayan ,The Tahsildar Palladam Tiruppur District Village Administrative Officer Palladam Tiruppur District 5 Pon Vijayan ,The Village Administrative Officer Palladam Tiruppur District 5 Pon Vijayan
Judges: M Duraiswamy
14 June, 2017·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4.2. The petitioners have filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the patta No.2334 under...
Madras High Court
M/S Arul Store vs The Commercial Tax Officer
Judges:
14 June, 2017·mk Assessing Officer within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.14.06.2017 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No mk To The Commercial Tax Officer, Ariyalur Assessment Circle, Commercial Ta...
Madras High Court
S.Amirtharajan vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative ...
Judges:
14 June, 2017·This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the balance amount of Rs.7,02,201/- towards terminal retirement benefits of Gratuity and PF amount along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum, of the petitioner's representa...
Madras High Court
S.Subramani vs The Director General Of Police
Judges:
14 June, 2017·The petitioner joined the Respondent Department as Grade-II Police Officer on 30.04.1988, and he is serving as Special Sub-Inspector of Police in Prohibition and Enforcement Wing, Uthangarai, Krishnagiri District and he was awarded Certificate of Commendation by his senior officers for doing a comme...
Madras High Court
Shree Agencies vs Joint Commissioner (Ct)
Judges:
14 June, 2017·Writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to restore the petitioner TIN 33583783500.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a registered dealer and the petitioner was allotted TIN 3783500 on 04.04.2005. The number was converted as TIN 33583783...
Madras High Court
K.Paul Pandian vs The Government Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
14 June, 2017·This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner's arrears of salary in the post of Forest Ranger from 31.10.2008 till the date of his retirement on 31.08.2012 as per the direction of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.2871...
Madras High Court
M/S.Vardhaman Constructions & ... vs The District Registrar
Judges:
14 June, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. The learned counsel submitted that liberty may be given to the petitioner to work out his remedy before a Competent Civil Court.2.In vie...
Madras High Court
V V R Choudry vs The Secretary And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
14 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to invoke Section 34-A of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 and supersede the 4th respondent Society and appoint a Special Officer for the 4th respondent Society.2. According to th...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.