K.K.Seenivasan vs P.Thangaraj
Judges:
23 June, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set-aside the fair and decretal order dated 19.01.2017 made in I.A.No.62 of 2016 in O.S.No.19 of 2016 on the file of the Sub Court, Perundurai.2. The petitioner is the plaintiff and respondent is the defendant. The petitioner filed a suit for recovery o...
Madras High Court
N.Senthil Kumar vs Ansari
Judges:
23 June, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.) The Court heard the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also perused the materials placed before it.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner constrained to approach this Court to r...
Madras High Court
Meerashakki vs M/S. Pinnacle Data
Judges:
23 June, 2017·There is no representation for the petitioner for several hearings. The notice has not been served on the respondent from the year 2014. Hence, the conduct of the petitioner clearly shows that he is not interested to proceed with the trial in C.C.No.5430 of 2011 and want stall the proceedings.2. On ...
Madras High Court
Hajee K.K.Ibrahim Ali Higher ... vs D.Sabitha
Judges:
23 June, 2017·Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of this Court dated 15.03.2016, made in W.P.(MD).No. 18130 of 2013, has been complied with by the respondent in letter and spirit and produced a copy of the letter of the District Education...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The Secretary To Government
Judges:
23 June, 2017·The writ petition has been listed under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of the letter dated 13.06.2017 given by the learned counsel for the petitioner before the registry. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed a...
Madras High Court
Maria Michael Raj vs Sabitha
Judges:
23 June, 2017·Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the order of this Court dated 15.03.2016, made in W.P.(MD).No. 22107 of 2015, has been complied with by the respondents in letter and spirit and produced a copy of the letter of the fourth responden...
Madras High Court
(Appeal Against The Order Passed ... vs S. Sathiyavel
Judges:
23 June, 2017·Vrn/at Writ Appeal No.764 of 2019 and CMP No.6046 of 2019 09.03.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
T.Sumitha Celin vs Rajendra Rathno
Judges:
23 June, 2017·Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent has stated that the order of this Court dated 29.08.2016, made in W.P.(MD).No. 15033 of 2016, has been complied with by respondent in letter and spirit and produced a copy of the letter of th...
Madras High Court
D.S.Velayutham vs R.Ramalakshmi
Judges:
23 June, 2017·kj C.R.P.(PD)Nos.3511 and 3513 of 2016 & C.M.P.No.17850 of 2016 23.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
S Sarala Devi vs The Inspector General Of Registration And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
22 June, 2017·The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the Power of Attorneys both dated 15.06.2015 vide Doc. Nos.4024 & 4025 of 2015, SRO, Tambaram and also Sale Deeds both dated 18.06.2015, vide Doc. Nos.4133 & 4134 of 2015, SRO, Tam...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.