In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The Director General Of Police
Judges:
26 July, 2017·It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondents police have been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.2. An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfett...
Madras High Court
M.Nazeer Mohammed Through His vs The District Collector
Judges:
26 July, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.) The petitioner has filed this writ petition to direct the second respondent to remove the encroachment stated to have been caused by the third respondent in respect of the road in S.No.144/1, 142(3) and 142(5) in Idayapatti village, Manaparai Taluk...
Madras High Court
Latha vs The District Magistrate And ...
Judges:
26 July, 2017·[Order of the Court by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] The petitioner challenges the impugned order of detention, dated 06.04.2017 in P.D.O.No.14 of 2017, detaining him as "Goonda", as contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of dangerous activities of Boot leggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest...
Madras High Court
P.Rajeshwari vs The Municipal Commissioner
Judges:
26 July, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN.,J] By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2 The petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition would aver among other things that the land located at ward No.8, division No.4, Kamatchi Amman Street near Famo...
Madras High Court
S.Selvaraj vs The Co-Operative Tribunal
Judges:
26 July, 2017·The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging against the order passed in Co-C.M.A.No.61 of 2008. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is the owner of the agricultural land and cultivating sugar cane. The petitioner entered into an agreement with the 3rd respondent as per the sugar-...
Madras High Court
G Shankari vs The Commissioner Corporation Of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai 600 003 And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
26 July, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.07.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.19035 of 2017 & W.M.P.No.20551 of 2017 G.Shankari ... Petitioner v.1. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai - 600 003.2. The Chairperson/...
Madras High Court
R.Manikandan vs The Commissioner Of Land ...
Judges:
26 July, 2017·The writ petition has been filed to call for the records relating to classification of old survey No.59 in Malingapuram, Aanaimalayanpatti, Uthamapalayam, Theni District, quash the same and consequently, forbear the respondents from carrying out in the proceedings for dispossession in old survey No....
Madras High Court
L.Robinson vs Prakash
Judges:
26 July, 2017·This Court, by order dated 15.04.2016, in W.P.(MD).No.7330 of 2016 directed the respondent herein to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 04.04.2017, within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. Since the respondent herein has not complied with the same, the petitioner ...
Madras High Court
Chennai Port Trust vs Union Government Of India
Judges:
26 July, 2017·Prayer in W.P.No.25690 of 2004:-Writ Petition, filed under <act id=zbGxPokB_szha0nWKNIH section=226>Article 226 </act>of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Declaration, declaring that sub-section 3 of Section 45 of the Customs Act, 1962 as introduced by virtue of the Finance Act, 22 ...
Madras High Court
Rukkumani vs The Assistant Registrar Academic ...
Judges:
26 July, 2017·The petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the second respondent college to refund the tuition fee of a sum of Rs.64,000/- collected by the second respondent college.2. After issuing notice in this writ petition, Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu, learned counsel appears for the first respondent University. Th...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.