N.Murugesan vs Smt.Nanjammal
Judges:
03 January, 2017·These appeals are filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.175 of 2002 & O.S.No.2229 of 2004, dated 31.01.2007, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court cum Fast Track Court No.2, Coimbatore.C O M M O N J U D G M E N T A.S.No....
Madras High Court
K.Nasurullah : vs The Manager
Judges:
03 January, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.] The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first and second respondents resulting in possession notice dated 02.03.2016 and consequential Auction Sale Notices dated...
Madras High Court
Kumaran vs Ganesan
Judges:
03 January, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order, dated 15.07.2016, made in I.A.No.1862 of 2015 in O.S.No.221 of 2015, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.2. Facts of the case:(i) The petitioner is the plaintiff and the ...
Madras High Court
Impact International Trust vs The Member Secretary
Judges:
03 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner has impugned the notice, though appealable, on the ground that it was predicated on a factually incorrect plea of there being no planning permission while, in fact, planning permission had been granted.2. No counter affidavit ...
Madras High Court
S Loganathan Claimant/ vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Judges: S Vimala
03 January, 2017·THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.1515 of 2014 S.Loganathan ... Claimant/Appellant versus Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Villupuram Division – I, Villupuram. … RespondentPrayer : This Appeal filed under ...
Madras High Court
N Rathinavel ( Deceased ) And Others vs V Jayaraman And Others
Judges: N Sathishkumar
03 January, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISHKUMAR C.R.P(NPD).No. 1635 of 2007 1.N.Rathinavel (deceased) 2.Kamalammal (second petitioner brought on record as LR of the deceased sole petitioner vide order of Court dated 11.06.2014 made in M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012 in CRP.(NPD)NO.1635 of 2007) ......
Madras High Court
M.Rajan vs State Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
03 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) On hearing the learned counsel for parties, we direct that the representation of the petitioners dated 31.10.2016 be disposed of within a maximum period of one (1) month from today.2.Learned Special Government Pleader states that on a simila...
Madras High Court
Arokiya Mary vs Amburos
Judges: M V Muralidaran
03 January, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.01.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN C.R.P. (PD) No.3412 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Arokiya Mary .. Petitioner vs Amburos .. Respondent Revision filed under Article 227 of Constitution of In...
Madras High Court
Divisional Office vs Ramachandran
Judges:
03 January, 2017·The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order dated 21.02.2012 made in MCOP.No.20 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Subordinate Court), Panruti. Aggrieved against the order passed by the Tribunal, the second respondent before the Tribunal/insurance company has ...
Madras High Court
S.Jeyakanthan vs State Through
Judges:
03 January, 2017·This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members, under the guise of enquiry.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the State.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would s...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.