R.Saravanamuthu vs The Managing Director
Judges:
07 February, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.K.Venkataramani, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.P.Kannan Kumar, learned Standing counsel for Transport Corporation accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.2. The petitioner has averred that he retired from servic...
Madras High Court
T.V.Lokaiah vs Mr.Duraipandi
Judges:
07 February, 2017·The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and seeks time to communicate the order to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. The said submission is placed on record.2. In the light of the same...
Madras High Court
R.Perumaraj vs The Chief Engineer (Admn.)
Judges:
07 February, 2017·COMMON PRAYER : These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent herein in ref. K.No.018900/603/N.P.3/Vu 1/Ko.Contract Labourer/2009-2 dated 0...
Madras High Court
T.S.Manuvel vs Mr.Nandhakumar
Judges:
07 February, 2017·It is represented by both sides that the order passed in the writ petition has been complied with.2.Recording the abovesaid submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.To1.Mr.Nandhakumar District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.2.Mr.Ram Pradeepan Revenue Divisional Offi...
Madras High Court
Vijayaraja vs P.Sekar
Judges:
07 February, 2017·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants against the award of Rs.3,20,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs and Twenty Thousand only) for the death of one Selvarani, the wife of the first appellant/first claimant, aged about 33 years, stated to be earning about Rs.6,000/- (...
Madras High Court
M.Paramasivam vs R.Murugan
Judges:
07 February, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The contempt petition is affirmed on 7.9.2015. The learned Government Pleader states that the order dated 19.12.2014 was complied with albeit belatedly on 19.9.2016, after serving notice on the offending party.The aforesaid statement is take...
Madras High Court
J.Kalaivani vs P.Thangaraj
Judges:
07 February, 2017·This revision petition is preferred by the defendants challenging the order allowing an application under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C filed by the plaintiff.2. The suit is filed by the respondent herein for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from preventing the plaintiff to have free ingress...
Madras High Court
Putrukkan Nagathamman ... vs K.R.Viswanathan
Judges:
07 February, 2017·The suit is filed by the plaintiff for injunction restraining the defendants from encroaching or altering the suit property. It is stated that pending suit, in I.A.No.375 of 2015 , interim injunction was granted. While the order of interim injunction is in force, it is alleged that the defendants ha...
Madras High Court
J.Kalaivani vs P.Thangaraj
Judges:
07 February, 2017·This revision petition is preferred by the defendants challenging the order allowing an application under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C filed by the plaintiff.2. The suit is filed by the respondent herein for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from preventing the plaintiff to have free ingress...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By
Judges:
07 February, 2017·By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. Mr.K. Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.P. Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.3. The petitioner was appoi...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.