S.Santha vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport ...
Judges:
13 February, 2017·The petitioner was employed in the respondent Corporation and he retired from service on 30.06.2015 on attaining the age of superannuation.2.He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits.3.The First Bench of this Court in similar matter has...
Madras High Court
Abdul Samadhu vs Mr.Jeyaraman
Judges:
13 February, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J] The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the order passed by this Court dated 16.04.2013, made in W.P.(MD)No.6130 of 2013.2. This Court, by judgment dated 16.04.2013, directed the Tahsildar, to consider the representation o...
Madras High Court
B. Manikumar vs N.Baskar
Judges:
13 February, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the suit. It appears that the matter has already been settled out of Court. Recording the memo, this suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Half of the Court fee may be refunded to the plaintiff as per law, if ...
Madras High Court
M.Poongkodi vs The Chief Manager
Judges:
13 February, 2017·(Delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J) Contending inter alia that M/s.Win Associates, Tiruppur, has abused and threatened the writ petitioner/borrower to settle the loan amount, borrower, has sought for a writ of mandamus directing the Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Tiruppur Branch and M/s.Win Associate...
Madras High Court
W.P.No.2526 Of 2017 vs 5 V.R.Venkatachalam
Judges:
13 February, 2017·Salem District Salem- 636 001.2 The Tahsildar Sankari Taluk Salem District.3 The Superintendent of Police Salem District Salem.4 The Inspector of Police Sankari Police Station Salem District.W.P.No.2526 of 2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
Janakiammal vs Subbiah Gowder
Judges:
13 February, 2017·The respondents 1 to 3/defendants 1 to 3 are the appellants. The suit in O.S.No.613 of 1992 was filed by the 1st respondent herein seeking partition and separate possession of 1/3rd share in the suit property and a preliminary decree came to be passed on 28.01.1999. The plaintiff filed an applicatio...
Madras High Court
W.P.No.3447 Of 2017 vs 6 Thiru.A.Chelladurai
Judges:
13 February, 2017·The prayer in this petition is to forbear the respondents 3 and 4 from interfering with the civil dispute in respect of the property situated in No.106 Mettukulam Koyambedu Village Chennai 600 107 pending between the petitioner and the 5th respondent in C.S.No.24/2017 on the file of this Honourable ...
Madras High Court
Esquire Express Logistics Pvt. ... vs The General Manager
Judges:
13 February, 2017·The prayer in the Writ Petition is for issuance of mandamus to the respondents to issue the Letter of Acceptance in favour of the petitioner, in regard to the tender, called for leasing of Parcel Space in Parcel Cargo Express Train, scheduled to run from Korukkupet to Shakurbasti, in terms of the Te...
Madras High Court
S Karthikeyan And Others vs The Authorised Officer And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, M Govindaraj
13 February, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.02.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ W.P.Nos.3541 & 3542 of 20171. S.Karthikeyan2. Mrs.K.Aparna Devi .. Petitioners in both W.Ps. versus1. The Authorised Officer, ICICI Bank Ltd...
Madras High Court
T.Rajkumar vs Dr.Palaniappan
Judges:
13 February, 2017·The second defendant has preferred this revision challenging the dismissal of the application refusing to receiving the additional written statement filed by him under Order 8 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.