Pariyur Amman Spinning Mills (P) ... vs Tamilnadu Generation And ...
Judges:
18 February, 2017·in W.P.No.19703 of 2017 PRAYER in W.P.No.19703 of 2017 :- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2nd respondent's impugned communication in letter No.CE/ NCES/ SE/Solar/ EE/ SCB/ A2/ F.Sol...
Madras High Court
C.Gunasekaran vs 3 The Administrator
Judges:
17 February, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.P.Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2.The petitioner joined the services of Pallavan Transport Corporation on 12.03.1981, which after merger and amalgamation and demerger and amalgamatio...
Madras High Court
P.Sundar vs The Government Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
17 February, 2017·and T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.jvm WMPs.SR 119296 and SR119297 of 2016 and WMPs. SR 125586 and SR125585 of 2016 in Rev.Aplws.114 and 117 of 2013 in W.P.Nos. 600 of 2006 and 11772 of 2009 17.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
J.V.K.Rajan vs K.Subramaniyan @ Subbu
Judges:
17 February, 2017·The insolvency petition is filed under Sections 7, 8 and 10 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, by two of the debtors seeking adjudication of themselves as insolvents. The said petition has been returned by the trial Court stating that the petition filed by them jointly, is not maintainable. Though Se...
Madras High Court
J.Meena vs T.Manikandan
Judges:
17 February, 2017·C O M M O N J U D G M E N T Children are not mere chattels nor are they toys for their parents. Absolute right of parents over the destinies and the lives of their children, in the modern changed social conditions must yield to the considerations of their welfare as human beings so that they may gro...
Madras High Court
S. Usman Ali vs The Commissioner
Judges:
17 February, 2017·This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation. dated 06.02.2017 and to direct the respondent to issue the deposit amount Rs.4,03,024/- which was deposited by the petitioner, in the name and style of S...
Madras High Court
P.Panchu vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
17 February, 2017·This petition has been filed to the 1st Respondent to give necessary direction to the 2nd Respondent to complete the investigation in Crime No.331 of 2014 and to file Final Report within the stipulated time.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Sid...
Madras High Court
A.N.Rajagopal vs Pachaiyappa'S Trust
Judges:
17 February, 2017·When the Tr.C.M.P. came up for hearing on 07.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, it was directed to be listed on 10.02.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today (17.02.2017), when the Tr.C.M.P. is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petition...
Madras High Court
G. Shahul Hameed vs 4 The Divisional Engineer
Judges:
17 February, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the writ petition.2 In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.17...
Madras High Court
Amirthammal And Others vs Dharani And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
17 February, 2017·Both these civil revision petitions arise out of an order of rejection of plaint in O.S.No.1717 of 2006 and more so, issue involved in both revisions are one and the same and the parties are also one and the same, therefore this Court decides to dispose these Revisions by this common order.2. The re...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.