R. Malik Basha vs The Managing Director
Judges:
20 February, 2017·By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents .2. The petitioner joined the services of the respondent Transport Corporation on 28.09.1991 as a Conductor and after having served the Department for ...
Madras High Court
M. Padmini vs The Management Of
Judges:
20 February, 2017·By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents .2. The petitioner, would aver, that her husband V. Mohan was employed as a Driver in the 1st respondent Corporation from 09.04.1997 and after completi...
Madras High Court
Palaniammal vs The Sub Registrar
Judges:
20 February, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2015 is closed....
Madras High Court
S.Raju Raman vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
20 February, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Innisai Kacheri in the place mentioned in the petition, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.2....
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs C.Arumugam
Judges:
20 February, 2017·This petition is filed seeking to punish the respondent herein for having wilfully disobeyed the order dated 21.12.2015 made in WP No.40320 of 2015 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.rgr2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the respondent sub...
Madras High Court
Saradha V.Ram (Deceased) vs R.Ramabai
Judges:
20 February, 2017·2. The mother of the plaintiff and the mother of the 1st defendant are sisters. 1st defendant remained unmarried. The plaintiff and his sister namely, Saradha V.Ram are only close relations of the 1st defendant. The plaintiff owned certain immovable properties at Madurai and he was also a Chief Arti...
Madras High Court
W.A.No.188 Of 2017 vs S.Vijayakumar
Judges:
20 February, 2017·and S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.va W.A.Nos.188 & 143 of 2017 and C.M.P.Nos.2922 & 2433 of 2017 20.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
Mrs.R.Chandra vs Tmt.M.Lakshmi
Judges:
20 February, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that despite specific boundaries have been given in the registered Sale Deed dated 06.07.1990, the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram, is not in compliance of the order dated 28.04.2015 made in W.P.No.12689 of 2015 and prays...
Madras High Court
M/S Southern Polypet Pvt Ltd vs The Chief General Manager And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, M Govindaraj
20 February, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.02.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJW.P.No.3323 of 2017 W.M.P.No.3291 of 2017M/s.Southern Polypet Pvt. Ltd., rep., by its Managing Director, P.Prabhuram .. Petitioner v...
Madras High Court
The Royal Sundaram Insurance Co Ltd vs Padmavathy And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, M Govindaraj
20 February, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ C.M.A.No.409 of 2017 & C.M.P.No.2857 of 2017 The Royal Sundaram Insurance Co. Ltd., Salem. .. Appellant .. Vs ..1. Padmavathy2. Sengodan3. Dharmaraj4. Subramani ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.