Kiran Kumar vs The State Rep By
Judges: V Bharathidasan
28 February, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.02.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.3965 of 2017 Kiran Kumar ... Petitioner Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, W-5 All Women Police Station, Vepery, Chennai.(Crime No.2/2016) ...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs M/S. State Express Transport ...
Judges:
28 February, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner joined the service as a Conductor in the respondent Corporation on 15.12.1979 and he was promoted as Checking Inspector on 03.06.2006 and further promoted as Traffic Inspector on 18.07.2012 and retired from service on 30....
Madras High Court
M.Marimuthu vs Md.A.Tajudeen
Judges:
28 February, 2017·As per the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.To1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Karur....
Madras High Court
The Superintending Engineer vs D.Jayabal Padayachi
Judges:
28 February, 2017·The defendants in O.S.No.10 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Court (FTC-II), Cuddalore are the appellants. The said suit was filed by the 1st respondent/plaintiff claiming damages for the loss of about 2500/- Casurina trees, valued at Rs.3,75,000/-.2. According to the plaintiff, he had...
Madras High Court
M.Mohamed Saliya vs The Union Of India Rep. By Its ...
Judges:
28 February, 2017·K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.This Writ Petition is directed against the order, dated 23 July 2015 in the Original Application in O.A.No.74 of 2012, dismissing the Original Application filed by the petitioner claiming Selection Grade from 1 January 2009.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the lea...
Madras High Court
The Commissioner vs Sri Sastha Sangam
Judges:
28 February, 2017·PRAYER: Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2008 in O.S.No.501 of 2005 on the file of the Vth Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.2. Accoding to the plaintiff, it is a registered Society. The said Sangam has got 342 members. I...
Madras High Court
M.M.Kumaresan vs M.Shanmugavadivu
Judges:
28 February, 2017·Prayer in C.R.P.P.D.No.594 of 2017:Civil Revision Petition filed under <act id=zbGxPokB_szha0nWKNIH section=227>Article 227 </act>of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.389 of 2016 in O.S.No.770 of 2008 dated 16.09.2016 on the file of the V Additional Distric...
Madras High Court
Omana vs Thanumoorthy
Judges:
28 February, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 15.04.2016, passed in I.A.No.151 of 2015 in O.S.No.71 of 2013, by the learned Principal District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel.2.The petitioners are the defendants and the respondents are the plaintiffs ...
Madras High Court
Mrs.G.Rosammal vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
28 February, 2017·By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner would state that her husband L.Gnanam was appointed as a Sr. Assistant in the erstwhile State Transport Corporation on 06.07.1963 and his service was also regularized in the said post and subsequently, on formation of va...
Madras High Court
N.Arumugam vs Mr. S. Thirunavukkarasu
Judges:
28 February, 2017·This contempt petition is filed complaining that the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.21181 of 2016, dated 04.11.2016 has not been complied with.2.This Court passed an order in the said writ petition, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.09.2016 and ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.