C.Chellappan vs 4 The Junior Engineer
Judges:
22 February, 2017·Mr.P.Vijendran, learned counsel is present on behalf of the writ petitioner. Mr.Gunasekaran, learned Additional Government Pleader is present on behalf of the 1st & 3rd respondents. Mr.P.Richardson Wilson, learned counsel for M/s P.Wilson Associates is present on behalf of the 2nd respondent. There ...
Madras High Court
D.Durga Devi vs Union Of India
Judges:
22 February, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.] The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking for the following relief:"Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the proceedings made in O.A.No.826 of 2011, on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, dat...
Madras High Court
K.A.Packeer Mohammed vs P.K.Abdul Khader @ John
Judges:
22 February, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the appellants made an endorsement indicating that he is withdrawing the second appeal as the dispute between the parties has been settled out of Court.2. Recording the same, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.To:1.The Principal District Judge, Th...
Madras High Court
Andal vs Lakshmi Narasimman
Judges:
22 February, 2017·This revision is directed against the order of the learned Principal Sub-Judge, Tindivanam in I.A.No.344 of 2008 in O.S.No.212 of 2000, dated 25.07.2011, dismissing the petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and declining to condone the delay of 1552 days in filing application to resto...
Madras High Court
G.Alagesan vs Elangovan
Judges:
22 February, 2017·This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the private complaint in C.C.No.6 of 2010 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam as against the petitioner.2.It is averred in the petition that the petitioner is an Inspector of Police, Pa...
Madras High Court
M/S.J.Y.International vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)
Judges:
22 February, 2017·gg8. The captioned writ petitions are disposed of, in the aforesaid terms. Resultantly, the pending application shall stand closed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.22.02.2017 gg To The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Kodungaiyur Assessment Circle, 5/79, II Floor, V Cross Street, Kaviarasu...
Madras High Court
A Ravivarma vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
22 February, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.02.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.8188 of 2013 A.Ravivarma ..Petitioner vs.1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary to Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.2. The Dir...
Madras High Court
M/S.J.Y.International vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)
Judges:
22 February, 2017·gg W.P.Nos.43028 and 43030 of 2016 and WMP No.36879 of 2016 22.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
Superintending Engineer vs R.Parvathy
Judges:
22 February, 2017·Despite the matters being listed under the caption For Dismissal, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It is seen that, the appeal is pending from the year 1992, and no purpose would be served in keeping these petitions pending, when no steps have been taken to get the appeal n...
Madras High Court
Shanthamani vs Kandhammal
Judges:
21 February, 2017·The defendant in the suit has filed these revisions challenging the fair and decreetal orders dated 26.09.2013 made in I.A.Nos.782 and 783 of 2013 in O.S.No.194 of 2008 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Palladam.2. The facts in brief are as under: The respondent/plaintiff filed the s...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.