Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Superintending Engineer vs R.Parvathy

Madras High Court|22 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Despite the matters being listed under the caption For Dismissal, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It is seen that, the appeal is pending from the year 1992, and no purpose would be served in keeping these petitions pending, when no steps have been taken to get the appeal numbered. Hence, these petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently,CMA.Sr. is rejected.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Superintending Engineer vs R.Parvathy

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.