M/S Marudhar Tecchem Limited Rep By Its Director Krishna Kumar Maheswari vs The Commissioner And Others
Judges: R Subbiah, A D Jagadish Chandira
02 August, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. SUBBIAH,J.,)The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking for an issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from initiating any coercive action of locking and sealing and demolition action with regard to the buil...
Madras High Court
U Sai Eswari vs The Inspector Of Police And Others
Judges: A Selvam, P Kalaiyarasan
02 August, 2017·THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN H.C.P.No.1393 of 2017 U.Sai Eswari Petitioner vs.1. The Inspector of Police, M4-Redhills Police Station, Chennai-600 0522. M.Kamalarajan ... Respondents Petition filed under A...
Madras High Court
S Siva vs The District Collector Collectorate Tiruvannamalai District 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Office Of The Revenue Divisional Office Tiruvannamalai District 3 The Tahsildar Taluk Office Polur Taluk Tiruvannamalai
Judges: M Duraiswamy
02 August, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.08.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.19822 of 2017 S.Siva ... Petitioner v.1. The District Collector Collectorate Tiruvannamalai District 2 .The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divi...
Madras High Court
K George And Others vs Sri Ram Chits Tamil Nadu Private Ltd
Judges: M Govindaraj
02 August, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.08.2017C O R A MTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJC.R.P.(NPD) Nos.2454 and 2455 of 2017 and C.M.P.Nos.11621 and 11622 of 2017 1.K. George2. K. Mohan3. Bharathi Raja4. K. Prabhudass ... Petitioners in both the CRPs Vs.Sri Ram Chits ...
Madras High Court
Baywest Power & Energy Private Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner Of
Judges:
02 August, 2017·Heard Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned counsel for the respondent.2. The petitioner in this writ petition has challenged the order of assessment passed by the respondent dated 17.03.2006 for the Assessment years 2001-02. The petitioner has ...
Madras High Court
J.A.Institute Of Engineering And vs The Anna University
Judges:
02 August, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.02.08.2017 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index:Yes/No vsi...
Madras High Court
M/S.Tide Water Oil Co. (I) Ltd vs The Joint Secretary To The Govt. Of ...
Judges:
02 August, 2017·Heard Mr.T.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the first respondent and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, senior panel counsel for the second respondent.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order passed by the first respondent, the Revisi...
Madras High Court
W.P.No.19775 Of 2017 And vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
02 August, 2017·Mr.R.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 & 3 and Mr.S.K.Rameswar, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 2, 4 to 6. By consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.2.The petitioner has filed the above ...
Madras High Court
P.M.Yusuf vs The District Collector
Judges:
02 August, 2017·This writ petition is filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents 5 and 6 from interfering with the petitioner's right of digging bore-well in his own patta land in S.No.194/2 situated at Valanadu Village, Manapparai Circle, Trichy District, and also to direct the...
Madras High Court
Chokkanatha Konar vs Indira Gandhi
Judges:
02 August, 2017·The present appeal is preferred by the plaintiffs in O.S.No.704 of 1985 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Virudhachalam, challenging the order of remand passed by the first appellate Court in A.S.No.119 of 2004.2. The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.