Tvl.Balakrishnan vs The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Judges:
06 April, 2017·Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent and by consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of assessment dated 30.06.2016. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the i...
Madras High Court
Kala vs 2 The Chairperson /
Judges:
06 April, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) In view of the Vending Committee having been constituted vide G.O. (4D) No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MCI) Department, dated 05.10.2016 and the proceedings of the Commissioner of Corporation in RDC.No.007/2016, dated 1.11....
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
06 April, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.] Challenge is made to the order of detention passed by the second respondent vide Proceedings in C.No.44/G/IS/2016 dated 12.10.2016, whereby the detenu, namely M.Manikandan, S/o Murugan, aged about 24 years, was ordered to be detained under GOONDA as c...
Madras High Court
G.Murasoli Maran vs The Chairman
Judges:
06 April, 2017·AND RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J ssk.W.A.Nos.831, 832 of 2015 & W.P.Nos.7148 & 18366 of 2014 6.4.2017.http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
)R.Jansirani vs A.Vivekanandan
Judges:
06 April, 2017·The revision petitioners are the legal heirs of one A.Raja Bhoopathi, who instituted the suit for partition against his brother who is the respondent herein. Pending suit, Raja Bhoopathi died and the revision petitioners were impleaded as plaintiffs.2.When the suit was posted for trial, the revision...
Madras High Court
Thanislas vs The Sub-Inspector Of Police
Judges:
06 April, 2017·On the complaint lodged by one Aravintha Kumar, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.88 of 2008 and after completing the investigation, filed a charge sheet in C.C.No.248 of 2008 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Padmanabhapuram against three accused for offences under Sections 44...
Madras High Court
D.Mariappan vs Kamalakanan Tex
Judges:
06 April, 2017·Petitioner seeks quash of proceedings in S.T.C.No. 324 of 2012 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate,Fast Track Court II, Erode.2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.3. Petitioner, who is the second accused in case pending trial in S.T.C.No. 324 of 2012, has...
Madras High Court
K.Shivashankar vs The Commissioner
Judges:
06 April, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and has circulated a Letter dated 03.04.2017 to the Registry to that effect. He has also made an endorsement in the petition.2. In view of the submission of the letter dated 03.04.2017 to t...
Madras High Court
J.Muthu Vijayan vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ...
Judges:
06 April, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the rejection order dated 16.03.2017 passed by the first respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarified ma...
Madras High Court
A.Palanikumar vs K.Phanindra Reddy
Judges:
06 April, 2017·The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the order of this Court in the Writ Petition has been complied with.2.Recording the said submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.To1.K.Phanindra Reddy, Secretary, The State of Tamilnadu Municipal Administration and Water Supply De...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.