Miss.B.Shalini vs Elayaraja
Judges:
13 November, 2009·These two revision petitions have been filed by the revision petitioner/claimant as against the order dated 28.02.2009 in I.A.Nos.258 and 259 of 2009 in M.C.O.P.No.6 of 2009 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode in dismissing the applications filed by the petitioner under Rule 20(...
Madras High Court
Kalyani vs Girija
Judges:
13 November, 2009·C.R.P.(NPD) No.3023 of 20071. Ravi2. Kalyani ... Petitioners Vs1. P.Vidyuthavalli Thayar2. V. Girija3. Mrs. M. Gowri4. Ms.M. Lakshmi5. Kousalya6. Ajitha ... Respondents C.R.P.(NPD) No.3399 of 2007 Mrs.V. Girija ... Petitioner Vs1. Kousalya2. Ajitha3. Ravi4. Kalyani5. P. Vidyuthavalli Thayar6. Mrs.M....
Madras High Court
M/S.Devi Agencies vs The Authorised Officer
Judges:
13 November, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by S.J.MUKHOPADHAYA, J.) The Writ Petition was preferred by the petitioner for a direction to the third respondent to take up the appeal filed by the petitioner and others, pending in I.N.No.534 of 2009.2. When the case was taken up, it was brought to the notice of the C...
Madras High Court
Naina Mohammed vs Peer Mydeen
Judges:
13 November, 2009·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the award, dated 13.11.2009, passed in M.C.O.P.No.47 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - 1st Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli.2.The appellants herein are the claimants and the respondents herein are the respondents in th...
Madras High Court
Dr.A.Suresh vs The Director General
Judges:
13 November, 2009·Heard Ms.G.Rajakumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.G.Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the respondent.2. The petitioner though made an innocuous prayer for a direction to the respondent to consider his representation dated 20.4.2009, a perusal of the record shows that it is not so innocuo...
Madras High Court
V.Sivaprakasam vs V.S.Indirani
Judges:
13 November, 2009·(Delivered by F.M.IBRAHIM KALIFULLA,J.) These appeals arise out of the common judgment and decree dated 15.7.2003 passed in O.S.Nos.15 of 1999 and 3 of 2001. A.S.No.970 of 2003 has been filed against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.15 of 1999 on the file of Family Court, Salem, which was filed for...
Madras High Court
Dr.R.S.Lal Mohan vs The Executive Engineer (Wro)
Judges:
12 November, 2009·D.MURUGESAN, J.This pro bono publico petition is filed by the petitioners seeking for a direction to the official respondents, namely, the Executive Engineer (WRO), Public Works Department, the District Collector, the Assistant Environmental Engineer, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Kanyakumari ...
Madras High Court
S.Subramani vs The Commandant
Judges:
12 November, 2009·The petitioner has filed the writ petition, challenging the order, dated Nil August, 2000 passed by the second respondent, confirming the order of the first respondent, dated 19.4.2000.2.By the order, dated 19.4.2000, the first respondent held that charges against the petitioner were proved. Therefo...
Madras High Court
K.H.Rafia vs Dr.M.Murugan
Judges:
12 November, 2009·(JUDGMENT OF THE COURT WAS DELIVERED BY THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The appeals seek to challenge the order passed by a learned Single Judge dated 16th August 2007 on an interim petition bearing W.P.M.P.No.12872 of 2006 in Writ Petition No.11322 of 2006. This writ petition was filed by one Dr....
Madras High Court
Basanth Kumar Ranka vs Union Of India
Judges:
12 November, 2009·(The Order of the Court was made by S.J.Mukhopadhaya,J) In this case, the petitioner has challenged the validity of Sections 17(2) to 17(4) of the SARFAESI Act. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submits that similar matter fell for consideration before a Full Bench of this Court in ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.