E.P. Manoharan Vincent vs Karuna Vincent
Judges:
19 November, 2009·(Judgment of the Court is made by PRABHA SRIDEVAN,J.) Both the parties were present in Court.2. The appeal has been filed by the son against the mother challenging the decree obtained by her for recovery of a sum of Rs.16,00,000/-. When the matter came up before us for admission, we felt that consid...
Madras High Court
N. Purushothaman vs The Presiding Officer
Judges:
19 November, 2009·This writ petition is filed to call for the records of the proceedings in E.A.No. 1 of 2008 in E.P.No. 1 of 1996 in P.C.T.P.A.No. 4 of 1993 on the file of the Presiding Officer and Sub Divisional Magistrate(North), Revenue Court, Puducherry and the consequential Notice dated 7.7.2008 issued to the p...
Madras High Court
C.Santhiselvi vs The Director Of Elementary ...
Judges:
19 November, 2009·Mr.R.Manoharan, learned Government Advocate has taken notice for the respondents 1 to 3. Mrs.P.Krishnaveni, learned counsel has taken notice for the fourth respondent.2.The petitioner has come forward with this Petition seeking for the relief of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned ...
Madras High Court
A.Kovilpillai Nadar vs Arulmighu Kailasanathasamy
Judges:
19 November, 2009·The first defendant is the appellant. The second appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 08.01.1997 made in A.S.No.109 of 1994 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 16.02.1984, made in O.S.No.30 of 1993, on the file of the...
Madras High Court
K.Sadasivam vs The Additional Registrar
Judges:
19 November, 2009·Heard Mr.N.Manokaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.T.Seenivasan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2, apart from Mr.K.V.Shanmuganathan, learned counsel for the third respondent.2. The writ petition is directed against the order of the first respondent...
Madras High Court
S.Greesh Kumar vs The Cabinet Secretary
Judges:
19 November, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by D.MURUGESAN,J) The petitioner is a practising Advocate. He has filed this writ petition in public interest, particularly in the interest of Judiciary. According to him, he came to understand that there were definite proposals for introducing Bills on the following. (v...
Madras High Court
Prakash @ Jayaprakash vs State By:
Judges:
19 November, 2009·(The judgment of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) Challenge is made to the judgment of the learned Additional District and Sessions Division, Fast Track Court No.1,Erode, made in S.C.No.222 of 2008 whereby the appellant ranked as A2 along with the other accused ranked as A1 stood charged, t...
Madras High Court
V.Ramar vs Director Of Medical And Rural
Judges:
19 November, 2009·The petitioner is a poor coolie worker, working in a brick kiln in Vandari village. He approached this Court with this petition for a direction to the Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai, the Medical Officer, Saptoor Primary Health Centre, Madurai, the District Collecto...
Madras High Court
M/S.Arkay Energy (Rameswaram) ... vs Sundaram Brake Linings Ltd
Judges:
18 November, 2009·Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Section 37(1)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the common order dated 29.04.2009 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in O.A.Nos.374, 375...
Madras High Court
Coimbatore Consumer Cause vs The Secretary To Government
Judges:
18 November, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by Prabha Sridevan, J.) The petitioner is a consumer organization which has been registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act. The present writ petition has been filed in "Public Interest" alleging that public buildings have been allowed to come up in coimb...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.