V.Thiagarajan vs United India Insurance Company ...
Judges:
14 July, 2009·This petition has been listed under the caption "For Dismissal", since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, on an earlier occasion, i.e., on 10.07.2009. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No c...
Madras High Court
J.Mariadoss vs The State Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
14 July, 2009·The petitioner, Office Assistant attached to the Commercial Tax Department, was alleged to have removed a mini lorry from the compound of Commercial Tax Department without any orders from the Superior Officer, has challenged the order of his dismissal, from service.2. The facts of the case are as fo...
Madras High Court
S.Vinu vs The Chief Educational Officer
Judges:
14 July, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2.2. At this stage of hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the r...
Madras High Court
Habeas Corpus Petition No.1584 Of ... vs Unknown
Judges:
14 July, 2009·Per ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.This petition has been filed by the mother of a boy of ten years, who is visually and mentally handicapped and who is said to be missing while he was in the custody of the third respondent school.2. In her affidavit, the petitioner has submitted that they have admitted their ...
Madras High Court
S.K.Arumuga Mudaliar vs A.Palaniappan
Judges:
14 July, 2009·The first Respondent in I.A.No.425 of 2008 in O.S.No.51 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kodumudi, is the Petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition.2. The suit in O.S.No.51 of 2008 was instituted by the Revision Petitioner against Respondents 2 to 7, praying for a...
Madras High Court
Bsa-Regal Group Ltd vs Tube Investments Of India Ltd
Judges:
14 July, 2009·of 2009 vs.Tube Investments of India Ltd., rep by its Vice President-Legal, & Company Secretary Mr.S.Suresh 'Dare House' 234, NSC Bose Road, Chennai 600 001. Respondent in A.No.1391/2009 / Applicant in O.A.Nos.31 and 32 of 2009 Appearance as in O.A.Nos.31 and 32 of 2009:The plaintiff carries on an e...
Madras High Court
M/S.Optigrab International vs Government Of India
Judges:
14 July, 2009·The prayer in this writ petition is to quash the order passed by the second respondent dated 11.11.2008 and direct the second respondent to consider the application of the petitioner seeking settlement by Settlement Commission, Customs and Central Excise.2. The facts necessary for disposal of the wr...
Madras High Court
Mrs.Beena vs Regional Administrator
Judges:
13 July, 2009·By consent of both parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for and quash the order of the first respondent, dated 2.7.2009, and to direct the first respondent...
Madras High Court
P.Apoorvam vs Anandh
Judges:
13 July, 2009·Heard the submissions made on either side.2. The revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Cuddalore in Crl.R.P.No.8 of 2007 directing to issue summons to the accused 3 to 8, who are the petitioners herein.3. The respondent prosecuted the petitioners here...
Madras High Court
Raja @ Selvaraj vs The State
Judges:
13 July, 2009·Petitions filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 26.10.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Gobichettipalayam, in Crl.M.P.No.4644 of 2006 in C.C.No.34 of 2006.Challenging and impugning the order dated 26.10.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Gobichetti...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.