Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2009
  6. /
  7. January

S.Vinu vs The Chief Educational Officer

Madras High Court|14 July, 2009

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2.
2. At this stage of hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.12.2000, directed to be disposed of by the first respondent, on merits, within a specified period.
3. There is no representation for the third respondent. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 , has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, without going into the merits of case, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 16.12.2000, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been disposed of till date. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the first respondent a copy of the representation, dated 16.12.2000, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
arr To The Chief Educational Officer, Nagarkoil.
The District Educational Officer, Thuckalay.
The Secretary/Head Master.
Parent-Teacher Association, Govt.Higher Secondary School, Kalkulam, Thucklay Post, Pincode 627 175
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Vinu vs The Chief Educational Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 July, 2009