P.S.Sivagnanam vs The Executive Officer
Judges:
16 July, 2009·The revision petitioner/respondent/plaintiff has filed this present civil revision petition as against the order dated 19.9.2006 in I.A.No.162 of 2006 in O.S.No.69 of 2004 passed by the learned District Munsif, Rasipuram.2. The trial Court, while passing orders in I.A.No.162 of 2006 has among other ...
Madras High Court
Raghuram Tandra vs Uti Bank Limited
Judges:
16 July, 2009·The petitioners have filed the above Criminal Original Petition to call for the records in C.C.No.1724 of 2005 on the file of the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai and quash the same.2. The facts of the case is as follows:The respondent/complainant herein is a bank-body corporate cons...
Madras High Court
K.Selva Bharathi vs The Revenue Divisional Officer
Judges:
15 July, 2009·(The Order of the Court was made by S.J.Mukhopadhaya,J) The prayer in the Writ Petition is for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the rejection order of the respondent in Na.Ka.631/2009/C4, dated 6.4.2009, quash the same and to direct the respondent to...
Madras High Court
B. Mookayee vs Ayyadurai
Judges:
15 July, 2009·1. The following are the allegations found in the petition filed under section 47 of C.P.C. by the petitioner in E.A.No.851 of 2005/respondent herein:1. (a) The petitioner is third party in O.S.No.798 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Trichirapalli. The respondent obtained a prelimin...
Madras High Court
Subramanian vs Chithuli @ Rajan
Judges:
15 July, 2009·Challenging and impugning the judgement dated 20.11.2002 passed by the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court III), Vridhachalam, in S.C.No.72 of 2001, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. Broadly but briefly, narratively but precisely, the facts which are absolutely necessary and germane...
Madras High Court
Minor G.Karthikeyan vs The Director Of Government ...
Judges:
15 July, 2009·Learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that the altered mark sheet, with the additional marks awarded in the subject of chemistry, had already been issued to the petitioner . Hence, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel ...
Madras High Court
R.Natesa Gounder vs M.Valliyammal
Judges:
15 July, 2009·The civil revision petition is directed against the fair and decreetal orders, dated 15.07.2009, passed in I.A.No.250 of 2008 in O.S.No.113 of 2006, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur.2. The revision petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.113 of 2006, on the file of the District Muns...
Madras High Court
Thangavel vs Kulathumettu Ayyanar Koil
Judges:
15 July, 2009·The revision has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed in I.A. No.1024 of 2006 in O.S. No.322 of 2006, wherein the Court below has rejected the application filed for impleading the petitioner in the suit.2. The case of the petitioner is as follows:The first respondent herein file...
Madras High Court
R. Kasi vs The Registrar
Judges:
15 July, 2009·(was made by ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.) The unsuccessful applicant before the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short "Tribunal) in O.A. No. 920 of 2005 has filed the present writ petition against its order dated 05.5.2006.2. The facts that lead to the filing of the present writ petition are that the p...
Madras High Court
K.Buddegounder vs Deputy Secretary To Government
Judges:
15 July, 2009·The petitioner claims to be a freedom fighter. The petitioner filed an application seeking freedom fighters pension to the respondent-District Collector. The said application was rejected on 18.4.2005 stating that the document submitted to prove the age is not correct and proper. It was stated that ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.