The Managing Director vs I.Ravichandran (A) Ravi Sam
Judges:
16 July, 2009·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.MURUGESAN J.) The Writ appeal in W.A.No. 796 of 2008 is at the instance of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. The Writ appeal in W.A.No. 378 of 2009 is at the instance of State. Both the writ appeals question the common order dated 28.4.2008 made in the writ peti...
Madras High Court
R.Ramachandran vs A.P.S.Exports Rep. By Its ...
Judges:
16 July, 2009·This petition is filed by the third accused in S.T.C.No.637 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi seeking to quash the proceedings.2. The respondent has filed the complaint against the petitioner and five other accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...
Madras High Court
J.Thompson Thangaraj vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
16 July, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.2. The petitioners had been appointed, originally, in the Non-provincialised Work-charged Establishment, in various posts, like Work Superintendent, Maistry and Work Superintende...
Madras High Court
R.Sriram vs R.Mahindran
Judges:
16 July, 2009·2.M.R.Sivaprakasam ...Respondent in CRP.879,880/093.S.Birla ...Respondent in CRP.879,880/094.B.Jegadeeswaran ...Respondent in CRP.881 & 882/09 PRAYER Civil Revision Petitions have been filed under <act id=zbGxPokB_szha0nWKNIH section=227>Article 227 </act>of the Constitution of India, against the or...
Madras High Court
S.Vellaipandian vs The District Elementary ...
Judges:
16 July, 2009·The admitted case of both the petitioner and the respondents is that the petitioner was employed as teacher in the second respondent School on leave vacancies from 17.08.1990 to 10.03.1995 as detailed below: From 17.08.90 to 20.09.90 05.10.90 to 23.11.90 24.11.90 to 17.01.91 18.01.91 to 28.02.91 01....
Madras High Court
The Special Tahsildar (La) vs S.Subramani
Judges:
16 July, 2009·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN, J.) These appeals are filed by the acquisition authority against the enhanced compensation determined by the Reference Court in respect of the lands acquired for the purpose of laying railway track from Salem to Karur in an extent of 2.01.0...
Madras High Court
Thangammal vs The Management
Judges:
16 July, 2009·The appeal is directed against the order of the Dy.Commissioner of Labaour, Salem, Authority under Workmen's compensation Act, 1923 dated 31.12.2002 in W.C.340 of 2000 (received by the Appellant on 16.1.2003 original postal cover containing the date of despatch as 14.1.2003 by the office of the Dy...
Madras High Court
Perumayee vs Perumal
Judges:
16 July, 2009·Heard Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr.P.T.S.Narendravaran, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. http://www.judis.nic.in2.This appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.20 of 2 2007 dated 16.07.2009 on the file of the Subordin...
Madras High Court
N.Dhanalakshmi vs P.Mohan
Judges:
16 July, 2009·Prayer in A.S.No.104 of 2008 This First Appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.82 of 2004 dated 16.11.2007, on the file of Additional District Court/Fast Track Court No.1, Thanjavur, in so far as declaring 1/6 th share to th...
Madras High Court
Srinivasapermal vs The Director
Judges:
16 July, 2009·Heard both sides.2.The petitioner was appointed as Skilled Assistant in the Carpentry and Blacksmith unit Karungulam Panchayat Union, by the proceedings of the Commissioner dated 13.01.1988 and he was appointed through employment exchange. As the Carpentry of Blacksmith unit has already been closed,...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.