Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2009
  6. /
  7. January

R.Sriram vs R.Mahindran

Madras High Court|16 July, 2009

JUDGMENT / ORDER

2.M.R.Sivaprakasam ...Respondent in CRP.879,880/09
3.S.Birla ...Respondent in CRP.879,880/09
4.B.Jegadeeswaran ...Respondent in CRP.881 & 882/09 PRAYER Civil Revision Petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order made in I.A.No.150, 151, 153, 154 and 157 of 2009 in O.S.No.86, 87 & 88 of 2009 dated 02.06.2009, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Kodaikanal.
PRAYER in CRP 881/09: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order made in I.A.No.156 of 2009 in O.S.No.88 of 2009 dated 02.06.2009, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Kodaikanal, which was extended to 15.06.2009 then to 02.07.2009 and then to 15.07.2009.
The revisions have been filed by the petitioners, who are the defendants in the suit filed in I.A.Nos.150, 151, 153, 154, 156 & 157 of 2009 in O.S.Nos.86, 87 & 88 of 2009 respectively pending on the file of the learned District Munsif, Kodaikanal.
2. It is represented by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners that the very suits are not maintainable., since the suits have been filed based upon the unregistered sale deed. It is further represented by the learned senior counsel that inspite of counter applications filed, the Court below has extended interim injunction without disposing of the same. It is also submitted that the suits are not maintainable, in view of the provisions of the Transfer of Properties Act. According to the learned senior counsel, in view of the fact that the suits are not maintainable, the Court below ought not have granted interim orders and extended them further.
3. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted inasmuch as the petitioners having filed the counter to the interim application the power of superindent under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be availed.
4. I have heard the learned counsels for the petitioners as well as for the respondents.
5. The suits have been filed seeking the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property as well as restraining the defendants from alienating the suit properties. Pending the suit, the respondents herein, filed applications in I.A.Nos.150, 151, 153, 154, 156 & 157 of 2009, seeking the relief of temporary injunction. The petitioners herein, have also filed the counter affidavits on 23.06.2009. This Court finds that under those circumstances, the Court below ought to have passed orders on the injunction application at the earliest more so, when the order of interim injunction have been granted already and when the petitioners have taken the plea of maintainability of the suit itself. Hence, considering the said submissions, this Court is of the opinion that the interest of justice require that the trial Court will have to be directed to dispose of the application filed by the respondents on or before 31.07.2009.
6. Accordingly, the learned District Munsif, Kodaikanal is directed to dispose of the Interlocutory Applications in I.A.Nos.150, 151, 153, 154, 156 & 157 of 2009 in O.S.Nos.86, 87 & 88 of 2009 respectively on or before 31.07.2009. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial Court immediately.
With the above directions, the Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There shall be no orders as to costs.
DP To
1.The District Munsif, Kodaikanal.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R.Sriram vs R.Mahindran

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 July, 2009