S.S.Iyyappan vs J.P.Balasubramanian
Judges:
07 August, 2009·This revision has been preferred by the petitioner/plaintiff against the order passed by the lower Court condoning the delay of 264 days in filing the restoration petition in I.A.No.1032 of 2003. The lower Court has, after going through the facts and circumstances of the case arising out of the affi...
Madras High Court
S. Nachimuthu vs R.Balasubramanian
Judges:
07 August, 2009·The petitioner has filed the above Criminal Original Petition to call for the records in C.C.No.493 of 2004 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet and quash the same.2. The respondent/complainant's case is that he has filed the C.C.No.493 of 2004 against the petitioner herein for an ...
Madras High Court
Kolanjiammal vs The Revenue Divisional Officer
Judges:
07 August, 2009·Writ Appeal No.797 of 2008 against the order dated 25.6.2008 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No.25194 of 2005 on the file of this Court.Writ Appeal No.992 of 2008 against the order dated 25.6.2008 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No.12933 of 2005 on the file of...
Madras High Court
Raju vs Sankarammal
Judges:
07 August, 2009·The petitioners seek to quash the compliant in C.C.No.311/2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore.2. The respondent has filed the private complaint against the petitioners for the offences under section 498(a), 494 r/w 109 of the Indian Penal Code. It is stated in the complain...
Madras High Court
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs Swamy Services Station
Judges:
07 August, 2009·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.CHOCKALINGAM,J) All these three writ appeals have been brought forth challenging the interim orders of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2006 in W.P.NO.36028 of 2006 dated 5.12.2006.2. The Court heard the learned counsel for the...
Madras High Court
K.Eswaran .. Revision vs K.M.Murugesan
Judges:
07 August, 2009·This Revision has been directed against the order of dismissal of the application seeking condonation of delay of 184 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree passed by the lower Court.2.The respondent herein, as plaintiff, filed the suit in O.S.No.470 of 1998 against the petit...
Madras High Court
M.S.Venkatesh Kumar vs M/S.Prasath Associates
Judges:
07 August, 2009·This revision has been directed against the judgment and decree passed in RCA.No.30 of 2005 in confirming the order passed in RCOP.No.67 of 2003 filed by the petitioners. The petition filed by the petitioners before the Rent Controller in RCOP.No.67 of 2003 seeking for the permission to deposit the ...
Madras High Court
Mrs. Divya J.Dolia vs The Secretary
Judges:
07 August, 2009·As both the appeals arise out of common order and appellants are common, they were heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.2. The land of the appellants were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). At that stage, writ petitions were filed ...
Madras High Court
S.Kadirvel vs Executive Engineer
Judges:
07 August, 2009·This revision has been filed by the respondent before the lower appellate Court against the order passed by the lower appellate Court in condoning the delay of 539 days in filing the appeal by the petitioner before the lower appellate Court, against the decreeing of the suit in favour of the respond...
Madras High Court
Order vs Unknown
Judges:
07 August, 2009·Application No.4339 of 2008 is an application filed by the applicants, who are the defendants 1 to 3 in C.S.No.636 of 2008. This is an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the C.P.C to reject the plaint filed by the respondents/plaintiffs.2. The respondents have filed the Suit for specific per...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.