Jagadeeswari vs K.C.Balasubramanian
Judges:
03 April, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner who is not a party in O.S.No.195 of 2000 on the file of the Court of First Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode. To execute the decree in O.S.No.195 of 2000, the plaintiff has filed E.P.No.113 of 2004. It is admitted by the learned couns...
Madras High Court
Dr.S.K.Prakash vs The District Collector
Judges:
03 April, 2009·Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the pet...
Madras High Court
A.Pazhanivel vs The Registrar
Judges:
02 April, 2009·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. It has been stated that the petitioner was appointed as an Office Assistant in Dr.Ambedkar Law University, Chennai, on 1.12.1997. The respondent, vide office order No.2003/121, dated 27.1.2003, had p...
Madras High Court
Kousalya vs A.P.Mani
Judges:
02 April, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners. Inspite of service of notice, there is no representation for only contesting second respondent.2. Under this Civil revision petition, an order passed in I.A.No.14 of 2005 in M.C.O.P.No.888 of 2001 on the file of the Court of Principal...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs M.Asamath Beevi
Judges:
02 April, 2009·Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation is on appeal challenging the award dated 31.10.2008 passed in M.C.O.P.No.230 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.2), Cuddalore.2. It is a case of fatal accident. The brief facts of the case ...
Madras High Court
Captain S.Dinakar vs Parvathi Subramani
Judges:
02 April, 2009·Heard both sides.2. This revision has been directed against the order passed in M.P.Nos. 39 0f 2009 and 40 of 2009 in RCA No.391 of 2008 on the file of the VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. Before the Appellate Authority, the revision petitioner herein had filed M.P.No.39 of 2009 to recall ...
Madras High Court
Poonkodi vs Subramania Chettiar
Judges:
02 April, 2009·The civil revision petitioner/defendant has filed this revision petition as against the order dated 15.06.2007 in I.A.No.184 of 2006 in O.S.No.72 of 2001 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai, in dismissing the application filed by the revision petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitat...
Madras High Court
Thulasiammal vs K.Ponnusamy
Judges:
02 April, 2009·Heard both sides.2. This revision has been directed against the order passed in I.A.No.239 of 2008 in O.S.No.540 of 2003 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 1223 days in filing a petition to set aside t...
Madras High Court
Sri Mariamman Rice & Oil Mill vs The Tamil Nadu Industrial ...
Judges:
02 April, 2009·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a writ of certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order, dated 22.12.2003, passed by the respondent in TIIC:ERD:LAO-PR:2003-04, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to disburse the withheld ...
Madras High Court
M.A.Periyanayagam vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
02 April, 2009·This Writ Petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the third respondent, dated 04.11.2003, made in Na.Ka.No.4408/03/A1 and to quash the same and to permit the petitioners to draw the original scale of pay fixed in the year...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.