G Siddeswar vs The State Of A P
Judges: C Praveen Kumar
16 October, 2014·THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CRL.P. NO:12493 of 2014 G.Siddeswar S/o Giriyappa, . Petitioner/Accused No.2 AND The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad . Respondent Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Shree Jayalakshmi Powercorp Limited vs Southern Power Distribution Company Of Andhra Pradesh Ltd
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
16 October, 2014·ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, in stopping wheeling of power from the petitioner’s hydel generation plant to its scheduled consumers purportedly on the ground of non-payment of reactive energy charges, as illegal and contrary to the terms ...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sri Laasya Minerals vs The Government Of Telangana And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
16 October, 2014·...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. T. SREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MINES & GEOLOGY (TG) The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is d...
High Court Of Telangana
Malli Chakravarthy vs The Station House Officer
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
16 October, 2014·...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. P. NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard. 2. Petitioner, who owns a lorry bearing No.AP 27 TW 3089, complains of illegal detention of his lorry by respondent No.1. 3. Learned counsel for ...
High Court Of Telangana
Shaik Sarwar vs The A P Foods
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
16 October, 2014·. Petitioner . Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Abhinand Kumar Shavili Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri P.Rakesh The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed with the grievance that respondent No.1 has invited only respondent No.2 for negotiations though the petition...
High Court Of Telangana
P Chandrasekhar Reddy vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
16 October, 2014·… Petitioners And Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others. … Respondents This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.29580 of 20...
High Court Of Telangana
G Parvathamma vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
16 October, 2014·ORDER: Heard. 2. There appears to be a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 relating to house property situated in the Revenue Division of Anantpur and sub-revenue division at Kodipalli Village and within the village limits of west Kodipalli. The said civil suit viz., O.S...
High Court Of Telangana
N Venkateshwara Rao vs The State Of A P
Judges: U Durga Prasad Rao
16 October, 2014·3) Heard arguments of Sri A.Hari Prasad Reddy, learned counsel for appellant/AO and learned Special Standing Counsel (Spl.SC) for CBI. 4) Impugning the judgment learned counsel for appellant submitted that the accused is innocent and as per the pass orders on the pension claims sent from the Pension...
High Court Of Telangana
Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary S/O V Parthasarathacharyulu
Judges: P Naveen Rao
16 October, 2014·THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.30344 of 2014 ORDER : Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn wit...
High Court Of Telangana
M D Gaffur Khan vs State Of A P
Judges: Raja Elango
16 October, 2014·This Criminal Appeal is filed by the sole accused challenging the judgment dated 21.06.2007 passed by the Special Judge for Trial under SC & ST (POA) Act, Kurnool in SC ST SC No.143 of 2006, whereby the learned Sessions Judge found the appellant guilty for the offence under Section 3(1) (x) of the S...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.