IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.29014 of 2014 BETWEEN G.Parvathamma AND ... PETITIONER The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Department of Revenue), A.P. Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and others.
...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Heard.
2. There appears to be a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 relating to house property situated in the Revenue Division of Anantpur and sub-revenue division at Kodipalli Village and within the village limits of west Kodipalli. The said civil suit viz., O.S.No.61 of 2011 pending before the Junior Civil Judge, Kalyandurg, seeking permanent injunction by respondent No.5 against the petitioner is stated to be pending. While so, the present writ petition is filed alleging that at the instance of respondent No.5, respondent Nos.3 and 4 have pressurized the petitioner to vacate the part of the said house in favour of respondent No.5. Hence, alleging that the police are interfering with the civil dispute, the present writ petition is filed.
3. Learned Government Pleader has received instructions from respondent No.4, which confirm that the aforesaid civil suit is pending between the parties and in view of that, the police have nothing to do with the said civil suit. It is also stated that no criminal case is registered against the petitioner as well as respondent No.5 and the allegations of the petitioner that there was pressure from the respondents, summoning of the petitioner for the purpose of removal of the bathroom or part of the dwelling house etc., are denied. It is also stated that the present writ petition is filed merely on an apprehension and as a preventive measure so as to ensure that no action is taken by the police in the event of any complaint is being issued.
4. Since the instructions aforesaid clearly state that police have no role to play as there is no complaint registered against the petitioner as well as against respondent No.5 and a civil suit being pending before the competent court, no action by respondent Nos.3 and 4 is envisaged. In view of that, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition.
5. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J October 16, 2014 Note:
Furnish copy within three days.
{B/o} LMV