Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation vs M/S Nest Enterprises Private Limited
Judges: A Rajasheker Reddy
16 October, 2014·Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad .. Petitioner AND M/s. Nest Enterprises Private Limited, represented by its Managing Director .. Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Company Application No.217 of 2013 ORDER: This Company Ap...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt Sk Nigar Sultana vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
16 October, 2014·Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Food & Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri C. Prakash Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (AP) The C...
High Court Of Telangana
Smt L Venkubayamma vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
16 October, 2014·Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Food & Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri C. Prakash Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (AP) The C...
High Court Of Telangana
Mohd Mateen vs The State Of Telangana
Judges: P Naveen Rao
16 October, 2014·…..Petitioner And The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary to Medical & Health Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and another. …..Respondents The Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.26790 of 2014 ORDER: This writ petition is filed de...
High Court Of Telangana
K Satish Kumar Reddy vs K Anuradha
Judges: M S K Jaiswal, G Chandraiah
16 October, 2014·K. Anuradha. … Appellant … Respondent HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No. 532 of 2007 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Chandraiah) This CMA is filed aggrieved by order dt.17.03.2007 passed in FCOP.No.1029 of 2005 on the file of the Judge, Family Cour...
High Court Of Telangana
Murrem Nagireddy vs Gajjala Narayana Reddy
Judges: M S K Jaiswal, G Chandraiah
16 October, 2014·2. The brief facts of the case are that M. Parthasarathy Reddy and M.Nitish Kumar Reddy, who are now aged about 17 years and 16 years respectively, are the sons of the appellant herein. The mother of the minor children, i.e., the wife of the appellant/petitioner died in the year 2004. Since then, th...
High Court Of Telangana
B Raghunath Reddy vs The Govt Of A P And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
16 October, 2014·The case of the petitioner is that in the family partition he succeeded the property i.e., agricultural land in Survey No. 390/2 to an extent of Ac.5.00 (4.96 cents) out of Ac.18.60 cents of Kunuturu village, Dharmavaram mandal, Anantapur district. The petitioner alleges that it is a private land a...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Satya Sai Aqua Products vs Eastern Power Distribution Company Of Andhra Pradesh Ltd And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
16 October, 2014·.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Chintapalli Srinivas Counsel for the respondents: Mr. P. Anand Seshu ORDER: This writ petition is filed on the apprehension that the respondents are likely to restore power supply to the petitioner’s Service Connection bearing No. PKL 00286. Under s...
High Court Of Telangana
Lingampally Venkatesh vs The State Of Telangana Through P S Shankarpally
Judges: C Praveen Kumar
16 October, 2014·THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER . 2 . //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District 2. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chevella Court at Chevella, R.R. District. 3. The Station House Officer, Shankarp...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sangamithra Indane Services vs Government Of A P And Others
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
16 October, 2014·.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Ms. V. Padmaja Reddy Counsel for respondents 1&2: A.G.P. for Civil Supplies Counsel for respondent No.3: Mr. Thoom Srinivas The court made the following: COMMON ORDER: These three writ petitions have been filed assailing the imposition of penaltie...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.