M/S Delhi & Andhra Cycle Company vs Raheemunnisa Begum And Another
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
11 June, 2014·JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree, dated 12.08.2008, in O.S.No.1318 of 2004, on the file of the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada. A memorandum of compromise has been filed by the appellant and respondents settling terms of compromise. Sri P.R.Prasad, ...
High Court Of Telangana
Abdul Raheem vs The State Of A P
Judges: B Siva Sankara Rao
11 June, 2014·2 Md Nasreen W/o Abdul Raheem Petitioners/Accused AND The State of A.P., rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad Respondent COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: SRI. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying th...
High Court Of Telangana
J Santhosh And Four Others vs The State Of A P
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
11 June, 2014·… Respondents The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2146 of 2012 ORDER: Learned counsel for petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to file fresh petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. ...
High Court Of Telangana
Alapu Satyanarayana And 4 Others vs The District Collector
Judges: S V Bhatt
11 June, 2014·…Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Writ Petition No. 12358 of 2008 O R D E R: No representation for petitioner on 29.04.2014 and 10.06.2014. I directed the writ petition to be posted for dismissal today. There is no representation even today. The writ petition is dismissed for default. No or...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sethurama Builders & Engineers Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India
Judges: A V Sesha Sai
11 June, 2014·O R D E R: This writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the action of the second respondent/The Registrar of Companies, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, in not striking off the first petitioner’s name from the Register of companies and launching criminal prosecution...
High Court Of Telangana
The Sub Inspector vs A V Santhosh Kumar And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
11 June, 2014·1. It is submitted that the petitioner has joined as a shareholder of the ‘DELTA CABS’ Pvt. Ltd. (office regd. no. #3-5-121/E/13) on 26.04.2010 office at #3-5-121/F/13, Adj.to Jagruti P.G. College, Ramkoti, Hyderabad. He has deposited Rs.1,00,000/- (one lakh) towards SBI Bank cheque no.247491 in the...
High Court Of Telangana
Apsrtc Rep By vs M Shivaraj Died Per Lrs And Others
Judges: R Kantha Rao
11 June, 2014·Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the petitioners-APSRTC and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Aggrieved by the common order dated 11-2-2000 in C.M.A.Nos.23 and 24 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, where under both the app...
High Court Of Telangana
Danduvaripalle Ramesh
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
11 June, 2014·Danduvaripalle Reddemma and another. …Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.1787 OF 2012 ORDER: This petition is filed to quash orders in M.C.No.33 of 2008 on the file of II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Madanapalli whereunder a sum of Rs.1500/- is g...
High Court Of Telangana
The Madanapalli Revenue Division vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Public, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
11 June, 2014·DATED: 24.09.2014 Between: The Madanapalli Revenue Division, Vaddera Community Welfare Society … Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.118...
High Court Of Telangana
V Sarabeswara Rao vs The Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co Op Corporation
Judges: R Kantha Rao
11 June, 2014·…Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.25422 OF 2000 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition for adjudication and therefore prayed to dismiss the same as infructuous. Recording the above submission, the...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.