Katragadda Nagamalleswara Rao vs The Chief Electoral Officer And Principal Secretary To Andhra Pradesh Government A P State Election Commission Bhudha And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
16 June, 2014·Katragadda Nagamalleswara Rao … Petitioner And The Chief Electoral Officer and Principal Secretary to Andhra Pradesh Government A.P. State Election Commission Bhudha Bhavan Tank Bund Road Hyderabad and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE...
High Court Of Telangana
Vemula Chandrakala vs The District Panchayat Officer And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
16 June, 2014·DATED:16.6.2014 Between: Vemula Chandrakala, Peddapalli Mandal, Karimnagar District. And The District Panchayat Officer, Karimnagar and others. … Petitioner ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.7886 of 2005 Or...
High Court Of Telangana
Bikumalla Giri vs The Commissioenr And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
16 June, 2014·DATED:16.6.2014 Between: Bikumalla Giri, Nalgonda. And The Commissioenr, Nalgonda District and others. … Petitioners ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.12315 of 2005 Order: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice...
High Court Of Telangana
G Akkarao And Others vs The Director Mines And Geology Department And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
16 June, 2014·G. Akkarao and others … Petitioners And The Director Mines and Geology Department BRKR Bhavan Tank Bund Hyderabad and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.20084 OF 2008 ORDER: (per the...
High Court Of Telangana
Dr Sri K Appala Naidu vs The Election Commission Of India And Others
Judges: A V Sesha Sai
16 June, 2014·Dr. Sri K. Appala Naidu PETITIONER AND 1. The Election Commission of India, Nirvachan Sadan Ashoka Road, New Delhi – 1000, rep. by its Secretary, and others. RESPONDENTS ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudi...
High Court Of Telangana
M Raghupathi And Others vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
16 June, 2014·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.22323 2007 DATED: 16-06-2014 Between: M. R...
High Court Of Telangana
P Nirmala Santhi vs The District Collector
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
16 June, 2014·DATED:16.6.2014 Between: P. Nirmala Santhi, Ravulapalem, East Godavari District. And The District Collector, Kakinada and tohers. … Petitioner ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.13989 of 2005 Order: (per the...
High Court Of Telangana
Sri Surender Nath vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: S V Bhatt
16 June, 2014·Sri Surender Nath Sing and 20 others …Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its S\Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and 6 others …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Writ Petition No. 12496 of 2008 O R D E R: Mr.K.Malleswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, requests the Co...
High Court Of Telangana
Ramesh Bhai R Desai vs The Commissioner
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
16 June, 2014·… Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.19855 of 2010 O R D E R: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the own...
High Court Of Telangana
Nalla Malla Reddy Educational Society vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: A Rajasheker Reddy
16 June, 2014·This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in charging additional consumption deposit amount and insisting to pay said amount by pressurizing the petitioners as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the 3rd respondent not to disconnect ...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.