Katta Sumitra And Others vs M/S Vijaya Travels
Judges: U Durga Prasad Rao
21 July, 2014·COMMON JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 24.11.2008 in M.V.O.P. No.566 of 2006 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal–cum–III Additional District Judge, Guntur, (for short ‘the Tribunal’), both claimants and Insurance Company preferred M.A.C.M.A No.920 of 2009 and M.A.C.M....
High Court Of Telangana
Katta Sumitra And Others vs M/S Vijaya Travels
Judges: U Durga Prasad Rao
21 July, 2014·COMMON JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 24.11.2008 in M.V.O.P. No.566 of 2006 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal–cum–III Additional District Judge, Guntur, (for short ‘the Tribunal’), both claimants and Insurance Company preferred M.A.C.M.A No.920 of 2009 and M.A.C.M....
High Court Of Telangana
C Sai Vishnuvardhan vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Public, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
21 July, 2014·C. Sai Vishnuvardhan … Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary Backward Classes Welfare (C2) Department Secretariat Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUST...
High Court Of Telangana
State Of Telangana And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
21 July, 2014·ORDER: Heard. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that his revision along with the stay petition being revision petition No.F2/837/2014 pending before the Joint Collector, Nalgonda, is not taken up at least to the extent of interim application. Petitioner also states that the said revision is pref...
High Court Of Telangana
Sri P Raveendra vs The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation And Others
Judges: R Kantha Rao
21 July, 2014·…Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.20380 OF 2014 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the...
High Court Of Telangana
P Varadamma And Others vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
21 July, 2014·THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.20360 of 2014 ORDER : The case of the petitioners is that they are the absolute owners and possessors of house site admeasuring 105 square yards in Survey No.81/1A1 of Bhanumukkala Village, Banaganapalle Nagar Panchayat and Mandal, Kurnool Distri...
High Court Of Telangana
The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
21 July, 2014·THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.20363 of 2014 ORDER : In this writ petition the only grievance of the petitioners is with regard to the insistence by the registering authorities on production of ‘No Objection Certificates’ (NOCs) from the Revenue Authorities as a condition prec...
High Court Of Telangana
Ginjupalli Venkata Ravamma vs The State Through Assistant Grain Purchasing Officer
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
21 July, 2014·At the time of ordering notice, this court ordered for release of confiscated stock in favour of the petitioner on furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.50,000/-. Heard both sides. Though as many as 30 grounds are taken in the revision, the main arguments advanced on behalf of the revision petitioner is t...
High Court Of Telangana
Myalavarapu Lalaiah @ Mailavarapu Lalaiah And Others vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: B Siva Sankara Rao
21 July, 2014·AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented through Nidamarru P.S., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad. . Respondent/Complainant. Petition under Section 438 of CR.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High ...
High Court Of Telangana
Nalluri Koteswara Rao vs The State Through Assistant Grain Purchasing Officer
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
21 July, 2014·At the time of ordering notice, this court ordered for release of confiscated stock in favour of the petitioner on furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.2,00,000/-. Heard both sides. Though as many as 30 grounds are taken in the revision, the main arguments advanced on behalf of the revision petition...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.