Brundavana Hanumantha Kumar vs State Of A P
Judges: K G Shankar
23 July, 2014·De facto Complainant HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.15468 of 2013 Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise the question regarding Section 354 IPC and other issues before the Trial Court and seeks by way of dis...
High Court Of Telangana
G Baby Sarojini vs The State Of A P
Judges: K G Shankar
23 July, 2014·G. Baby Sarojini, w/o. G. Sugandha Ratnam .. Petitioner/ Accused AND The State of A.P., rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, through Sub-Inspector of Police, Panjagutta, Hyderabad. and another. .. Respondents HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl. Petition No.1...
High Court Of Telangana
K Guna Sagar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: B Siva Sankara Rao
23 July, 2014·The Court made the following Order: //TRUE COPY// To ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1. The I Additional Sessions Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District 2. The Judicial First Class magistrate, Kuppam, Chittoor District. 3. The Station House Officer, Kuppam Police Station, Chittoor District. ...
High Court Of Telangana
J Sunil Kumar vs The State Of Telangana
Judges: B Siva Sankara Rao
23 July, 2014·A.2 were commission agents in foodgrains in Adilabad and the defacto- complainant is alleged to have worked for many years in A.P. State Co- operative Bank branches in Adilabad. Out of his acquaintance with the accused during his tenure and after his retirement, on the inducement of accused that to ...
High Court Of Telangana
The Commissioner Of Customs vs M/S The Kcp Limited Macheria Guntur District
Judges: Sanjay Kumar, Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
23 July, 2014·a. “Whether the CESTAT, Bangalore, is justified in allowing the cenvat credit on outward transportation beyond the place of removal, which is not specifically covered in the definition of “input services” under Rule 2(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004? b. Whether the CESTAT, Bangalore, is justified in...
High Court Of Telangana
Chereddy Jayaramireddy vs Chereddy Siva Reddy And Others
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
23 July, 2014·The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.663 of 2007 ORDER: This revision is preferred against judgment dated 18-01-2007 in S.C.No.167/2005 on the file VI Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Markapur whereunder respondents 1 to 7 are acqu...
High Court Of Telangana
M/S Sumithra Agro Chemicals And Others vs M/S Reco Agrotech Limited
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
23 July, 2014·Now the point that would arise for my consideration in this revision is whether the Judgments of the Courts below are legal, proper and correct? POINT: Advocate for revision petitioner mainly stressed on two points in challenge of judgments of courts below. The first objection of the advocate for re...
High Court Of Telangana
Vemula Ashwini Kumar vs M/S Reco Agrotech Limited
Judges: S Ravi Kumar
23 July, 2014·HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2210 OF 2005 ORDER: This revision is preferred against judgment dated 21-12-2005 in Criminal Appeal No.141 of 2001 on the file of VII Additional District and Sessions Vijayawada is confirmed. Brief facts leading to filing of this revision...
High Court Of Telangana
Obulreddy Prabhakar Reddy vs The State Of A P
Judges: K G Shankar
23 July, 2014·Date: 23.07.2014 Between: Obulreddy Prabhakar Reddy, and 2 others. .. Petitioners/ A.1 to A.3 AND The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, and another .. Respondents HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl. Petition N...
High Court Of Telangana
K Vineeth And vs The State Of A P
Judges: K G Shankar
23 July, 2014·2. The basic case of the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant is that the 2nd petitioner forged the signatures of the 2nd respondent and procured deposits of M/s. Anupama Finance Company in favour of the petitioners 1 and 2. Much water has flown under the bridge before the present complaint in FIR in...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.