Mohd Gouse vs Mohd Iliyas And Others
Judges: T Sunil Chowdary Second
24 January, 2014·6. Basing on the above pleadings, the trial court framed following issues: 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunction as prayed for? 2. To what relief the plaintiff is entitled to? 7. After analyzing the oral, documentary evidence and other material available on record, the trial c...
High Court Of Telangana
K Sai Krishna vs The District Collector Cum Chairman And Others
Judges: Noushad Ali
24 January, 2014·K. Sai Krishna PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee, Rehabilitation of Displaced persons, Kurnool District, and others. RESPONDENTS ORDER: Sri M. Subba Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ pet...
High Court Of Telangana
Indian Bank vs The Sub Registrar And Others
Judges: P Naveen Rao
24 January, 2014·, V.N. DEVADOSS Vs. CHIEF REVENUE CONTROL OFFICER-CUM-INSPECTOR AND OTHERS [4] CHIDAMBARA MANICKAM Vs SHAKEENA AND OTHERS [3] , K 11. Sri Ambudipudi Satyanarayana, learned counsel supplemented the arguments advanced by the learned senior counsel Sri E Manohar and further submits that the sale...
High Court Of Telangana
P Varalakshmi Bai vs Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams
Judges: Noushad Ali
24 January, 2014·…. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.12621 of 2011 ORDER : The petitioner was appointed as a Copy Holder to work in Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Press. In this writ petition, he has challenged the action of the respondents in seeking to retire him at the age of 58 ye...
High Court Of Telangana
Charminar Co Operative Urban Bank Limited vs A Reddy And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar
24 January, 2014·A common order was passed by the said Appellate Authority on 20.04.2005. Therein, he referred to the fact that the preliminary objections raised by the Bank as to the maintainability of the appeals had already been decided by the earlier order dated 16.03.2004 and therefore did not need replication....
High Court Of Telangana
Charminar Co Operative Urban Bank Limited vs A Reddy And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar
24 January, 2014·A common order was passed by the said Appellate Authority on 20.04.2005. Therein, he referred to the fact that the preliminary objections raised by the Bank as to the maintainability of the appeals had already been decided by the earlier order dated 16.03.2004 and therefore did not need replication....
High Court Of Telangana
Charminar Co Operative Urban Bank Limited vs A Reddy And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar
24 January, 2014·A common order was passed by the said Appellate Authority on 20.04.2005. Therein, he referred to the fact that the preliminary objections raised by the Bank as to the maintainability of the appeals had already been decided by the earlier order dated 16.03.2004 and therefore did not need replication....
High Court Of Telangana
Charminar Co Operative Urban Bank Limited vs A Reddy And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar
24 January, 2014·A common order was passed by the said Appellate Authority on 20.04.2005. Therein, he referred to the fact that the preliminary objections raised by the Bank as to the maintainability of the appeals had already been decided by the earlier order dated 16.03.2004 and therefore did not need replication....
High Court Of Telangana
R Sampath vs Central Industrial Security Force And Others
Judges: Noushad Ali
24 January, 2014·Order dated 13.1.2009 passed by the Assistant Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) rejecting the request of the petitioner for re-enlistment into service after the acceptance of his registration, as confirmed in the revision petition filed by the petitioner vide proceedings ...
High Court Of Telangana
Charminar Co Operative Urban Bank Limited vs A Reddy And Others
Judges: Sanjay Kumar
24 January, 2014·A common order was passed by the said Appellate Authority on 20.04.2005. Therein, he referred to the fact that the preliminary objections raised by the Bank as to the maintainability of the appeals had already been decided by the earlier order dated 16.03.2004 and therefore did not need replication....
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.