The Employees Colony Development Society vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
25 August, 2014·….Respondents. HONOURBLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 32110 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the third respondent. The case of the petitioner is that in the year 1975 Employees Residence Colony was formed at Gunipudi ...
High Court Of Telangana
Banoth Raju vs The Mandal Parishad Development Officer And Others
Judges: R Kantha Rao
25 August, 2014·…Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.30081 OF 2012 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. The Misce...
High Court Of Telangana
Chankuri Audemma And Others vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
25 August, 2014·AND ... PETITIONERS Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and two others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: --NONE APPEARED-- Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter...
High Court Of Telangana
Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt Ltd vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: A Ramalingeswara Rao
25 August, 2014·….Petitioner and Government of Andhra pradesh, rep. By its Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperation (FP.II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and ors ….Respondents. HONOURBLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 14697 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and lear...
High Court Of Telangana
G V Kameswara Rao vs The Indian Overseas Bank And Others
Judges: R Kantha Rao
25 August, 2014·THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.21078 OF 2012 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. The Miscellaneous Petit...
High Court Of Telangana
P Srinivasulu Reddy And Others vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
25 August, 2014·ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR...
High Court Of Telangana
A Nageswara Rao vs The Government Of A P
Judges: R Kantha Rao
25 August, 2014·…Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.11539 OF 2013 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. The Misce...
High Court Of Telangana
P Sudhakar
Judges: A V Sesha Sai
25 August, 2014·P. Sudhakar PETITIONER AND 1. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., rep. by its General Manager, Southern Region, 139, Nungambakkam, High Road, Chennai, and others. RESPONDENTS ORDER: When the matter is called today, it is represented by Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner that he has o...
High Court Of Telangana
Sri Rajendra Kotwal vs M/S Monarch Finlease Ltd
Judges: C V Nagarjuna Reddy
25 August, 2014·Sri Rajendra Kotwal …Petitioner And M/s.Monarch Finlease Ltd.,(in liqn.) Rep. by the Official Liquidator, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.Dhulipalla V.A.S. Ravi Prasad for Mr.N.Gangadhar Counsel for respondent No.1: Mr.M.Anil Kumar, C...
High Court Of Telangana
Gadi Manga Mani And Another vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Vilas V Afzulpurkar
25 August, 2014·AND ... PETITIONERS The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District and two others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: --NONE APPEARED-- Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hear...
High Court Of Telangana
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.