Dr.Beena Moidheen.K vs State Of Kerala
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
20 October, 2014·The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. jm/ Sd/ A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE...
High Court Of Kerala
K.Karappan vs State Of Kerala
Judges: C K Abdul Rehim
20 October, 2014·Petitioner is the Manager of an aided U.P.School situated in Malappuram District. When the request of the petitioner for upgradation of the school by sanctioning High School section was not considered, the petitioner had approached this court in an earlier writ petition. By virtue of Ext.P1 jud...
High Court Of Kerala
Surya Kiran S
Judges: A Muhamed
20 October, 2014·Considering the nature of relief sought for in these writ petitions, I am of the view that the relief cannot be granted. Accordingly the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. However, if the petitioners have any remedy regarding caste status, they are at liberty to approach the compete...
High Court Of Kerala
Joint Regional Transport Officer
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
20 October, 2014·In view of the decision reported in Musthaffa v. Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector [2014(1) KLT 575], the subject matter raised in the above writ petition does not survive. Hence the writ petitions are dismissed, following the aforesaid judgment. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB...
High Court Of Kerala
P.Jerome
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
20 October, 2014·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE.nj....
High Court Of Kerala
Narayan Alva vs State Of Kerala
Judges: A K Jayasankaran Nambiar
20 October, 2014·It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp...
High Court Of Kerala
M/S.Good Home (P)Ltd vs Union Of
Judges: A Muhamed Mustaque
20 October, 2014·This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd respondent to reconsider One Time Settlement (OTS) application submitted by the 3rd respondent in the light of Ext.P8 letter. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the guarantor and the 3rd r...
High Court Of Kerala
A.V.Soumini vs State Of Ekrala
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
20 October, 2014·Since the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that the entire retirement benefits due to the petitioners have been disbursed, there is no grievance subsisting. The writ petition stands closed recording the said submission.vku.Sd/-K.Vinod Chandran, Judge ( true copy )...
High Court Of Kerala
Dr.K.Karunakaran
Judges: A V Ramakrishna Pillai
20 October, 2014·Ext.P7 order dated 21st February 2011 passed by the Kerala Lok Ayukta on Complaint No.904 of 2010A preferred by the respondent herein is under challenge in this writ petition. 2. The respondent, a retired Professor, who demitted his office as Director, Department of Audit Education, Calicut Uni...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.