A.V.Soumini vs State Of Ekrala

High Court Of Kerala|20 October, 2014

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Since the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that the entire retirement benefits due to the petitioners have been disbursed, there is no grievance subsisting. The writ petition stands closed recording the said submission.

vku.

Sd/-

K.Vinod Chandran, Judge ( true copy )

Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Title

A.V.Soumini vs State Of Ekrala

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate

20 October, 2014

Judges

K Vinod Chandran

Advocates

Sri George Poonthottam

Judgements at Vakilsearch

Our Lawyer services

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

Talk to lawyer

By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.