C.K.Rajamma Chempothinkal vs State Of Kerala
Judges: P Ubaid
27 May, 2014·The revision petitioners herein are the two accused in S.T.No.2324/2009 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, (Mobile), Kottayam. A cheque jointly issued by them for ₹1,00,000/- in their capacity as the President and the Secretary of a Co-operative Society, was bounced due to i...
High Court Of Kerala
Rugmani
Judges: K Harilal
27 May, 2014·The petitioners are the legal heirs of the declarant Sri.P.Guruswamy and they are challenging the order passed by the Taluk Land Board, Chittur in C.C.No.1356 of 1973, directing them to surrender another extent of 2.84 acres of land in lieu of 2.84 acres of land, which is excluded from the account ...
High Court Of Kerala
V.P.Azeez
Judges: P Ubaid
27 May, 2014·Conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the N.I Act are under challenge in this revision. Pending the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably out of court and compounded the offence. The composition filed by them was accepted and permission was granted for composition un...
High Court Of Kerala
Leelavathy
Judges: P Ubaid
27 May, 2014·Conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are under challenge in this revision. The revision petitioner faced prosecution before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chittur under Section 138 of N.I Act, in S.T.No.2504/2009 brought by the 1st re...
High Court Of Kerala
Reji
Judges: P Ubaid
27 May, 2014·Conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the N.I Act are under challenge in this revision. Pending the proceedings, the parties settled the dispute amicably out of court and compounded the offence. The composition filed by them was accepted and permission was granted for composition ...
High Court Of Kerala
Abdurahiman Haji
Judges: K M Joseph, A Hariprasad
27 May, 2014·A.Hariprasad, J.Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, 1995 (in short, “Act”).2. Revision petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Wakf Tribunal (in short, “Tribunal”) in an original application filed under Sections 83(2) and 83(5) of the Act. Relevant facts ar...
High Court Of Kerala
B.Mahesh vs State Of Kerala
Judges: P Ubaid
27 May, 2014·Crl.M.A.No.3254 of 2014.Heard. The composition is accepted and permission is granted for composition under Section 320(6) Cr.PC. Crl.R.P.No.3117 of 2009.Conviction and sentence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act are under challenge in this revision. Pending the proceedings...
High Court Of Kerala
Shaji
Judges: P Ubaid
27 May, 2014·A cheque for ₹1,00,000/- issued by the revision petitioner in favour of the complainant, in discharge of the amount borrowed by him, was dishonoured due to in sufficiency of funds. On the allegation that the revision petitioner failed to make payment of the cheque amount inspite of statutory...
High Court Of Kerala
B.Mahesh
Judges: P Ubaid
27 May, 2014·Crl.M.A.No.3237 of 2014.Heard. The composition is accepted and permission is granted for composition under Section 320(6) Cr.PC. Crl.R.P.No.3911 of 2009.Conviction and sentence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act are under challenge in this revision. Pending the proceedings...
High Court Of Kerala
Jacob vs Shiny
Judges: V K Mohanan, A Hariprasad
27 May, 2014·Mohanan, J.The petitioner who is the respondent in I.A.No.1148/13 as well as in GOP No.511/13 preferred the above O.P. under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging Ext.P3 order by which the learned Judge of the Family court, Irinjalakuda, restrained the petitioner from doing any...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.