K.E.Saly vs State Of Kerala
Judges: P N Ravindran
05 June, 2014·When the writ petition came up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition any further. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. rkc.Sd/-P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE....
High Court Of Kerala
Babu Samuel
Judges: K M Joseph, K Abraham Mathew
05 June, 2014·K.M. Joseph, J C.M.Appl. 403 of 2014 in W.A. No. 754 of 2014 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. In the circumstances of the case, delay of 24 days will stand condoned. W.A.No.754 of 2014 We took up the case itself for admission. It is a c...
High Court Of Kerala
Thankappan
Judges: B Kemal Pasha
05 June, 2014·Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in spite of directions, the party has not turned up to produce the address of the 2nd respondent. This appeal is dismissed for default.All the interlocutory applications filed in this appeal are closed.ul/-Sd/- B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE [True copy] P.S....
High Court Of Kerala
Dileep Kumar M vs State Of Kerala
Judges: A M Shaffique
05 June, 2014·The petitioner had submitted Exts.P3 and P6 applications before the second respondent under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967. According to the petitioner, the property in question is neither paddy land nor wet land as per the data bank particulars available with the Local Level...
High Court Of Kerala
K.Purushan
Judges: A M Shaffique
05 June, 2014·Petitioner had submitted an application for survey of his property on the basis of his title deed. Admittedly, the property is water logged. By Ext.P7, the Additional Tahsildar attached to the second respondent's office had intimated to the petitioner that since the land involved is in a water logg...
High Court Of Kerala
K.K.Soman
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
05 June, 2014·The petitioner challenged the recovery proceedings initiated by the 3rd respondent in the above writ petition. On admitted defaults committed in a loan account, 3rd respondent had initiated proceedings for recovery and satisfaction of the same. Towards that end, the 3rd respondent had also a...
High Court Of Kerala
Krishnankutty.K.G
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
05 June, 2014·The petitioner availed of a housing loan and had committed default in the same. Since default was committed, the respondent Bank has initiated SARFAESI proceedings, in the context of there being arrears for reason of failure to pay the equated monthly instalments. 2. In the circumstances of the peti...
High Court Of Kerala
M.Sherif
Judges: P Ubaid
05 June, 2014·The revision petitioner herein is aggrieved by an ex parte order passed by the Family Court Palakkad in M.C No. 211/2013. In the said proceeding he was directed to pay maintenance to his children. They were represented by their mother, but maintenance was not ordered to the mother. In the main pro...
High Court Of Kerala
M Sudhakaran
Judges: A M Shaffique
05 June, 2014·The petitioner has approached this Court complaining about the illegal quarrying operation done by the respondents 3 to 5 and for a direction to respondents 1, 2 and 6 to initiate steps to stop the illegal activities in the property comprised in Resurvey No. 151/10 of Kottakkal Village. 2. The party...
High Court Of Kerala
Ms.Kairali Stock Suppliers
Judges: K Vinod Chandran
05 June, 2014·Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed against the petitioner for the year 2011-12 against which the petitioner filed Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P4 stay petition which are pending consideration. During the pendency of appeal and stay petition before the 2nd respondent, revenue reco...
High Court Of Kerala
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.